Asia
Going nuclear
Of 28 nuclear plants being constructed globally, 17 are
in Asia. Gulf News.
Jul 17, 2007
By
Abdullah Al Madani
In his recent survey, Professor Purnendra Jain, head of
Asian Studies at Australia's Adelaide University, holds
that many Asian countries are currently competing for nuclear
status in a way not seen since the 1970s.
He supports
his conclusion by reports suggesting that 17 of the 28 nuclear
power plants under construction around the world are in
Asia.
This
is true. In addition to Asia's two giants, India and China,
which are enhancing their nuclear-power generation capabilities,
almost all other Asian states are either on the way to going
nuclear or expressing their intention to have civilian nuclear
programmes.
Vietnam,
for example, has already decided to install two nuclear
reactors in the coming decade.
Thailand
is said to be conducting research for nuclear power
with the apparent aim of having a plant operational by 2020.
Malaysia
has hinted that it might consider the nuclear-energy
option in the near future.
The
South Korean government has already announced its
decision to increase the number of nuclear power plants
in the country.
And
Japan, the world's third largest home to
such plants after the United States and France, seems to
be ready to increase its dependency on power generation
from nuclear sources from the current 30 per cent to 40
per cent in the next 10 years.
The
Japanese, however, are very careful in this regard, something
that can be attributed to their fear of nuclear accidents
similar to the one in their Tokaimura plant in 1999.
On the
other hand, the Hong Kong authorities are under immense
pressure to go nuclear by establishing their own nuclear
power plants or benefiting from those across the border
in mainland China.
This
is aimed at improving the island's rapidly deteriorating
air quality, caused by its long reliance on fossil fuel
for electricity on the one hand and industrial pollution
from mainland China on the other.
As Professor
Jain correctly puts it, Hong Kong may lose its business
to other Asian countries if this environmental problem is
not quickly dealt with.
Enough
uranium available
Focusing
on the reasons behind this new nuclear race in the Far East,
one can list numerous driving factors, including the rapidly
growing demand for power due to economic and industrial
expansion and the improvement of living standards; high
oil prices in recent years; rising competition for natural
resources; the danger of over-reliance on imported oil and
gas for energy needs from the troubled Middle East; and
pressure to use more environmentally-friendly energy.
Moreover,
there is now enough uranium available to commence nuclear
programmes and, unlike fossil fuel, it is cheap.
According
to a report published in 2005 by the Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development, production of uranium recorded
significant increases between 2003 and 2005 with 19 countries
mining it, particularly Australia, Kazakhstan and Namibia.
The
aforementioned justifications for going nuclear, however,
have been met with severe criticism and opposition from
various local organisations and political forces, despite
the increasing support for cleaner and greener power-generation
options.
Their
argument often concentrates on the high costs and risks
associated with nuclear power, citing the disastrous consequences
of the 1979 accident at Three Mile Island in the US and
the 1986 Chernobyl explosion in the former Soviet Union.
It also
concentrates on the difficulty of ensuring that nuclear
technology once obtained will not be used for purposes other
than civilian.
Perhaps
the case of Indonesia is the best example of the ongoing
debate between pro and anti-nuclear option forces in Asia.
Indonesia
- 2010
Having
received a nod from the International Atomic Energy Agency
for its civilian nuclear programmes, Indonesia is planning
to start building its first nuclear power plant by 2010
and four other such plants by 2017 with the aim of producing
at least 17 per cent of the country's power demand from
untraditional sources.
It is
reported that South Korea has already agreed to help Indonesia
build these plants and provide fissile material and technology.
It is
also reported that Australia, the holder of 40 per cent
of world uranium deposits and the second-largest supplier
of this commodity after Canada, has expressed its readiness
to cooperate with Indonesia in this field under the 2006
bilateral security agreement.
While
Jakarta maintains that its going nuclear policy is significantly
important to ensure a steady supply power for more than
220 million people, overcome power-generation crises in
the country's most populous island of Java, meet the potential
threat of inadequate supplies of coal and natural gas, and
protect the environment from harmful pollution caused by
the massive use of fossil fuels, many individuals and groups
including legislators hold a different opinion.
They
argue that nuclear power plants are expensive and that they
will be funded at the expense of money allocated for promoting
education, health and housing. They also argue that Indonesia's
knowledge base in the nuclear field is extremely low.
Their
main concern, however, is about the risks associated with
nuclear power such as radioactive waste, leak or accident,
especially with fundamental Muslim groups targeting vital
civilian installations and the country being prone to natural
disasters including earthquakes and floods.
Dr
Abdullah Al Madani is an academic researcher and lecturer
on Asian affairs
http://www.gulfnews.com/opinion/columns/world/10137620.html