Singaporeans
say
"Goodbye Mahathir"
With deep admiration and worry about radicalism without
him, but many are happy to see the back of him. By Seah
Chiang Nee
Nov 1, 2003
SINGAPORE
- For the 3.25 million people on this island, the question
of who Malaysia's leader is has always been only second
in importance to their own for one reason.
It largely
determines how well - or badly - their lives could be. Especially
when it comes to a strongman like Dr. Mahathir Mohamad.
So when
he retires after 22 years, it has stirred up strong feelings
among the new generation here, which - like its Malaysian
counterpart - has known no other leader in Kuala Lumpur
other than Dr. Mahathir.
As the
world and Malaysians heaped a flurry of either accolade
or condemnation on him, Singaporeans have reacted with both
sentiments at the same time - not necessarily for the same
reasons.
They
have their own.
First,
the praise.
Singaporeans
know about and visit Malaysia more than any other country
on earth, many having close friends and relatives there.
Its achievements under Dr. M are well engrossed in their
minds.
It is
a modern, multi-racial nation that's one of Southeast Asia's
most advanced, but more important is M's success in keeping
Islamic and racial extremists firmly under control.
This
has deepened the Singaporeans' admiration of his vision
and his guts in striving for it.
To them,
he stands as a hero in the fight against terrorist bombers.
But
in recent years, Singaporeans have also suffered as a result
of his unpredictable brand of personal diplomacy that bore
little benefit even to Malaysia.
They
have generally stayed away from others' condemnation of
his "dictatorial" rule or alleged destruction
of state institutions, his persecution of Anwar or his attacks
on the West and Jews.
They
were, many feel, none of their business.
People
here are bothered more by his actions that had inflicted
direct harm on their lives.
They
ranged from the blocking of their Clob shares (grievous
financial losses) to angry outbursts, like "skinning
the cat (Singapore)" or referring to the option of
war, or charging that Singapore was part of the Jewish conspiracy
to fix Malaysia's economy.
Not to mention turning the difficult negotiations of water,
railway land, the proposed bridge, and other disputes into
a stormy - including legal - confrontation.
Now
that he is gone, however, the worry is turning to Malaysia's
ability to contain Islamic extremism.
Can
his milder, less combative successor, Abdullah Badawi, a
man who commands plenty of goodwill, prevent it from spreading?
This is viewed here as a potential threat.
Some
cautious observers here caution against excessive hope of
a quick rapprochement in bilateral ties under Mr. Abdullah,
however much he wants it.
He is
a consensus leader, which means any movement must come from
a small collection of UMNO leaders around him. Rule by collective
agreement takes time.
Mr.
Abdullah is unlikely to move closer towards Singapore, if
others don't go along.
And,
of course, there's a question whether the Singapore-baiting
Mahathir will continue to exercise any influence on this
issue.
One
immediate benefit, however, is that under the new reime
the Mahathir-type rhetorics and undiplomatic language against
Singapore will likely end.
Mr.
Abdullah's immediate priorities are to prepare - and score
a big win - in the forthcoming general elections and a host
of domestic problems left behind by his predecessor.
Of increasing
influence will be Defence Minister Najib Razak, who is the
top contender to become Deputy Prime Minister.
He is
the driving force behind Malaysia's current efforts to upgrade
its military capability with a US$4 billion hi-tech arms
purchase between now and 2005.
An assuring
factor is that Mr. Najib and Malaysia's cabinet members
and a omnipresent group of backroom party "kingmakers"
are moderates with none harbouring animosity towards the
republic.
This
includes Foreign Minister Syed Hamid, despite his upsetting
way of conducting then calling off talks, but the charade
was believed to be directed by Dr. Mahathir himself.
He is
likely to keep his portfolio - at least for the moment.
By Seah Chiang Nee