A
painful truth
Proud Malays in Malaysia must be wincing
at their premier's comment about their continuing special
rights after 30 years which explain a lot of things.. By
Seah Chiang Nee
June 16, 2002
Years
ago, when Dr. Mahathir Mohamad made his first attack on
globalisation saying it was bad for developing countries,
I was not very surprised.
The
reason, I wrote then, was the Malays in Malaysia were not
ready to compete even with the non-Malays in their own country.
How then could they compete with the wider world outside
- against the Americans, Japanese or Koreans, et all?
Now
Dr. Mahathir again talks about it - Malaysia's ethnic weakness.
The
Malay majority is weak because of the privileges it still
enjoys 30 years after it was given them.
A
whole generation has benefited from it - and probably feeling
helpless without it
If
someone with a lesser stature had said it, he would have
been political mince-meat, but Dr. Mahathir has been anything
but normal when it comes to speaking up.
While
Singaporeans may not be enamoured with him when he wants
to "skin Singapore" they have heaps of respect
for him when he dares to criticise extremism in his country.
He
has done it again.
In
an interview with a Malay-language paper, Dr. Mahathir accused
the majority Malays of failing to work hard and relying
too much on affirmative-action policies.
They
"would scream" if the government tried to abolish
these policies, which favour Malays in gaining places to
public universities, government jobs, bank loans and business
contracts.
He told the Malay-language Mingguan Malaysia newspaper:
"I consider these special rights for Malays to be a
crutch. If we always use a crutch, we will be lame forever."
Some Malays have been angered by the government's recent
move to test out a merit system for entry into public universities.
It
plans to allow ethnic Chinese and Indian students into government
junior colleges, which have traditionally been reserved
for Malays.
He
urged Malays to learn from the Chinese, whom he said comprised
only 26 per cent of Malaysia's population but were wealthy.
"The
Chinese people in Malaysia have no special rights. They
face discrimination. But they are more successful than us."
Privately,
some better-educated Malays agree with him.
Some
of them have told me they thought these special rights were
retarding their race and keeping their nation uncompetitive.
Not many are, however, prepared to say it publicly.
Take
the civil service.
Under
the quota system, four out of five civil servants must be
Malays, especially in the top and middle-level hierarchy,
which explains the bureaucracy's weakness.
The
affirmative-action has produced a reasonable number of Malay
professionals and managers since its launch in 1970 but
their numbers are spread thin.
With
the economic boom, the contest for top-class Malay talents
has intensified between the private and public sectors.
Most
of the top-class managers are found in the well-paid private
sector, especially multi-national corporations, leaving
the civil service (not the best of pay-masters) scrapping
the bottom of the barrel for whatever remain.
It
is unable to close the talent gap by recruiting non-Malays.
This has resulted in a civil service that is below its best.
In many areas, efficiency is compromised.
The
same, of course, happens in the armed forces, where the
skill level is even more serious.
New
military armaments and equipments are high-tech which require
a high level of education and sophisticated training not
readily available when it is confined to one race.
Even
among the lower ranks, these weapons need a fair knowledge
of English and Maths to operate them.
Dr.
Mahathir is the best person to resolve these shortcomings
arising out of the special rights as Malaysia started the
21st Century. Crcual is changing public mindsets - and education,
which decides the nation's future.
But
it seems that he is facing formidable opposition to even
the slightest idea of reducing some of these rights. The
question is: Will he run out of time?
Seah
Chiang Nee