"I
Don't Want Malays
in Public Service"
Diam
wants Malays to get out of out of civil service, face
the world and fight to survive. like the Chinese.
By Seah Chiang Nee
Apr 26, 2001
"A
few soft-spoken words into one receptive ear of the
Prime Minister is better than 20 years of talking
hard in Parliament."
Former Agriculture Minister Sanusi Junid used to tell
this to close friends when talking about politics
in Malaysia - and probably much of Asia.
For this reason, if you had asked any Malaysian who
was the second most powerful man in Malaysia, he would
probably have replied: Daim Zainuddin, Finance Minister
and UMNO Treasurer.
Because he had both Dr. Mahathir's ears and his trust,
the Finance Minister's words had helped to shape Malaysia's
economic policies for 20 years. This is no longer
true.
The relationship has since soured and Mr. Daim - so
the speculation goes - may soon be out of the cabinet.
What sort of man was he? A book "Daim - The Man
Behind The Enigma" published six years ago gives
an indication. It was based on interviews given to
two well-known women journalists, Cheong Mei Sui and
Adibah Amin.
It is easy to understand why he commanded so much
influence. What he advocated - a free market, a competitive
environment, privatisation and reduction of government
size - had helped to reshape Malaysia, especially
the Malays.
With Dr. Mahathir's heavy industrialisation, it had
turned Malaysia into a rapidly developing nation,
vastly improved its competitiveness against its neighbours,
including Singapore.
Many of Mr. Daim's concepts are based less on race
and emotions than on hard realism. Some are close
to what Singapore leaders would do under similar cumstances.
Take the 1985-86 recession. As finance minister, he
immediately tightened everyone's belt, including pruning
the huge, cumbersome civil service, freezing employment
- although short of cutting pay that the republic
did.
But that was enough to earn him widespread criticism
because the public service was the place the Malays
had always relied on for jobs.
With recruitment frozen, where would they go? More
than 60,000 graduates became unemployed. Almost all
were Malays. They became a pressure group. The next
move was to do away with the pension scheme for government
servants.
The Malays came to complain to him.
"Good," said Mr. Daim. "I don't want
Malays to join the public sector." He said the
British colonialists had wanted it that way, to have
the Malays in cosy, easy and relaxed jobs.
"The challenge is outside. The Malays must go
out. Face the world. Fight to survive," he said.
The service does not produce millionaires unless through
corruption, only the corporate world can."
Mr. Daim also revealed the circumstances leading to
Malaysia's decision to break up the Singapore-Malaysia
stock exchange, blaming it on the 1985 Pan Pacific
crisis.
It went into receivership to head off panic selling
of its shares, the Singapore authorities decided to
suspend the market.
Monetary Authority of Singapore Managing Director
Joe Pillai called Mr. Daim on a Sunday on the eve
of the closure and said it would close for three days.
The Kuala Lumpur side had to make its own decision.
The shares were traded jointly in both places. The
KL side had no choice but to close, too, to prevent
dumping of shares on Malaysia.
"It was then that Daim decided the exchange should
be split to give Malaysia control of its own market,"
the book alleged. That and, of course, the vast financial
potentials of an independent market.
But in his interview, Mr. Daim paid tribute to where
it was due especially on the strong Sing-dollar, which
he said, had raised some jealousy in the early days.
Mr. Daim said he had explained to the Malays that
it was due to Singapore's superior economic performance
and efficiency.
It was the same with the stock market. People bought
Malaysian shares in Singapore because it was more
efficient and the brokers there had bigger capital
bases to handle huge volumes.
Then when Singapore set up CLOB after the split, the
Malaysian cabinet was unhappy but he took a different
stand. The split had bought chaos to a hot market
when Malaysian brokers could not handle the volumes.
Millions of shares went missing.
If it had not been for CLOB, the problem would have
been much worse, Mr. Daim said, and no foreigner would
come to invest in Malaysia.
Mr. Daim defended charges that he had enriched himself
through his closeness to Dr. Mahathir and the control
he had of the multi-billion dollar UMNO corporate
empire.
He said he had always separated his own personal interests
and those of the country and party. In fact, he said
he had lost financially in serving the country, hence
his resignation. His book also brought out some aspects
of the personal relations between Senior Minister
Lee Kuan Yew and Dr. Mahathir Mohamad.
When Dr Mahathir suffered from a heart attack in 1989
which needed a bypass, Mr. Lee (who was then Prime
Minister) made many calls on his treatment.
The night before the operation, Mr. Lee contacted
Mr. Daim and suggested he contact the (now late) Australian
cardiac surgeon Victor Chang after obtaining Dr. Mahathir's
consent.
Mr. Daim rang the hospital and was told the doctors
had already begun preparation, so he rang Mr. Lee
back to tell him it was too late.
Mr. Lee offered to fly Dr. Chang to Kuala Lumpur and
said the Singapore government would bear all costs.
He said it was worth delaying the operation for 24
or 48 hours. Dr. Chang (who was my heart transplant
surgeon) had done 1,000 operations, he said.
Mr. Daim told Dr. Mahathir's wife, Mrs (Dr) Siti Hasmah
but she said since her husband had wanted local doctors
to do it, the family would honour his wish.
"Kuan Yew said he was very concerned: he did
not want to lose a friend," he said. After the
bypass, he called Mr. Daim four times to check on
Dr. Mahathir's condition.
It was reciprocated when Dr. Mahathir later made a
quick trip to Singapore to visit Brig-General Lee
Hsien Loong when he was admitted to hospital for cancer
treatment, when he himself was fighting a crucial
by-election in Johor.
What was his biggest regret, he was asked. It was
the failure to introduce a Singapore-type goods and
services tax. He saw this switch from taking earnings
to taxing consumption as vital for Malaysia's competitiveness.
People are waiting to see if he remains - in the words
of Senior Minister Lee "a shaker and mover of
events."
Seah Chiang Nee