Malaysia
My
Favourite Anwar Story
I received a phone call tip about a democtration
at the University of Malaya and rushed there to find...
Nov 3, 2000 (Updated Jan 2004)
Of all the Anwar stories
that I know this is my favourite. It is not designed
to praise him or belittle him. Just a straightforward
story.
I first laid eyes on this young firebrand without,
of course, knowing he would one day become the man
who almost made it to the top.
I
had arrived in Malaysia in July, 1970 to take up my
assignment as Bureau Chief of the defunct Singapore
Herald - 10 months after Malaysia’s race riots.
Those
were troubled times. Charred houses at Chow Kit remained
unrepaired because the owners were too frightened
to return. People were nervous, uncertain of the future.
Early
one morning, the phone rang and a voice asked, in
English, if I wanted to cover a story. "Come
down to the Malay Language Society (at the University
of Malaya) at 8 am. And oh, bring your photographer."
The
phone went dead before I could ask any question.
When
we arrived we saw about 300 Malay youths with yellow
cloths tied around their foreheads, carrying banners,
paint and a few sticks. With a shout from the leader,
they unfurled their placards and started marching
around the campus, yelling slogans.
They
smashed glass boards and tore up notices and destroyed
signs that were written in English. Fixed steel structures
that could not be damaged were painted over in black
paint.
It was an anti-English, pro-Bahasa demonstration,
The
leader was a young man named Anwar Ibrahim. The year
was 1970. Anwar was then 23.
I
cannot be sure but I suspect he was the caller. No
other journalists were there. We found ourselves the
only paper tipped in advance for a good reason, we
later found out.
Malaysia was in a racial turmoil. Along with Anwar
came another “racial extremist” –
or so every one said – a Kedah-born doctor,
Mahathir Mohamad.
That
Anwar had selected a small Singapore newspaper, a
start-up, to cover the event and avoided other major
foreign and Malaysian media showed him to be a shrewd
politician even as a youth.
Coming
so soon after the ethnic killings, he would have known
that the anti-English demonstration was dangerous.
People were still fearful of renewed bloodshed.
Besides,
making big headlines might have invited a government
crackdown, so he had opted to – softly –
make a big noise.
This
was the first half of the story. The other was to
come 21 years later.
In
1991, the same Anwar Ibrahim, this time wearing a
suit and tie and speaking as the Minister of Education,
was expressing his worry about the declining standards
of English in schools.
I
was then in Kuala Lumpur, writing my regular columns
for Lianhe Zaobao.
Anwar
was 44 and this was one of his last speeches as Malaysia’s
education minister. He was soon to become Finance
Minister and Deputy Prime Minister.
In
21 years he had swung from being a destroyer of English
to becoming its ardent advocate, from a destroyer
to a builder.
He
said he was worried about the results of the English
paper in the Malaysian equivalent of Singapore's "O"
Level, which had just been released.
Only
50.6 per cent of the students had passed English -
a drop of 8 per cent.
In
the 80s, as education minister he had been emphasising
the importance of English, an “evil” that
he had wanted to eliminate and replaced by Malay language
as a youth leader.
The choice was complete turn. Anwar, of course, was
not the only one to change.
Dr.
Mahathir Mohamad, who expounded racial views about
race that branded him a dangerous person by the Chinese
(and booted out of UMNO by the then Prime Minister
Tunku Abdul Rahman).
When he retired, the Chinese couldn’t have enough
of him.
When
Anwar became Deputy Prime Minister, a journalist friend
of mine related my story over a meal and he laughed:
"I'm sure your friend has also done ‘silly’
things when he was young that he would not do when
he's older."
In
21 years, Anwar had turned from a rebel wanting to
destroy English to a Western suit-wearing government
leader, cranking his people up to learn more of it.
First
under Dr. Mahathir and now Prime Minister Datuk Abdullah
Ahmad Badawi, Malaysia has been intensifying the learning
of English to become a developed nation.
The vast rural countryside fares poorly on this. During
my recent talk with government leaders in Malaysia,
I detected a strong desire to move into value-added
services.
Everybody I met in Putrajaya, the seat of government,
told me that Malaysia’s cost advantage over
Singapore was never a long-term solution and was being
overshadowed by the large countries like China and
India.
From
Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib down to senior
executives of Bank Negara and the National Economic
Action Council (NEAC), the message was clear: Malaysia
wants to move into higher technology, like IT, life
sciences and higher value manufacturing.
This
makes my Anwar story – by no mean Asia’s
only irony – more than just a young man’s
folly - but a national waste of time.
Seah
Chiang Nee