Stealing
Singapore's show
It may be richer but in freedom of speech, 'we're more respected"
says Jakarta Post editorial.
Sep 13, 2006
A group
of local and international non-governmental organisations
appears to have persuaded National Police Chief Gen Sutanto
and other senior government officials to alter their previous
position on the holding of a forum in Batam next week.
The
decision to allow them to hold the forum may have been a
reaction to accusations that they were pressured by the
Singapore government not to provide an opportunity for international
activists to gather in Batam, which is only 30 minutes by
ferry from Singapore.
Riau
Islands Police had also made it clear they were against
the seminar being held in Batam.
Singapore
will host IMF-World Bank meetings next week and naturally
it wants to ensure there are no disturbances of any kind,
including noisy protests from the NGOs.
Who
would not be upset by accusations they bowed under pressure,
especially by a city-state like Singapore?
On Monday,
despite his earlier opposition to the seminar being held
in Batam, the National Police chief said it could go ahead,
forcing the Riau Islands Police chief to swallow his words.
However,
regardless of what caused Sutanto to change his mind, it
is for the good of the country.
As the
world's 3rd-largest democracy after the US and India, this
is an excellent opportunity to reiterate the country's commitment
to freedom of speech.
Singapore
may be economically stronger than Indonesia but in terms
of freedom of speech, Indonesia is in a much more respectable
position.
Singapore
has allocated about US$86m (about S$130m) to finance next
week's meetings to see its ambition of having the world's
3rd-largest foreign exchange market, after London and New
York, take shape.
This
would make a welcome addition to the island-state's other
achievements like being declared the easiest place to invest
in on the planet by a World Bank report and its position
as the world's 8th largest stock exchange by market capitalisation.
Around
16,000 (updated to 24,000) participants will attend the
IMF-World Bank meeting from Sept 19 to 20, which is held
outside Washington every three years.
The
184-member IMF's main agenda is to accelerate its internal
reform to give bigger power to emerging economies like China,
South Korea, Mexico and Turkey following criticism that
members from the US and Europe are over-represented in the
Fund.
The
World Bank has put war ahead of corruption on its priority
list for the meeting.
As a
close neighbour and the largest economy in the Southeast
Asian region, what does Indonesia stand to benefit from
the conference?
As a
member of the 61-year-old Fund, Finance Minister Sri Mulyani
Indrawati said Indonesia did not have its own agenda for
the meeting but would follow the meeting's prepared agendas.
That
is, perhaps, one of the reasons why Sutanto was initially
reluctant to allow the NGOs to protest against the IMF-World
Bank forum.
Why
should he deploy large numbers of police personnel to guard
the NGOs' meeting in Batam just because they are banned
from protesting in Singapore?
Singapore
would get all the glory and money while Indonesia would
only draw criticism from the NGOs and local companies in
Batam.
Singapore
had made it clear it would not allow demonstrations, though
it will provide an 8-by-14-meter space in the lobby of the
conference venue, Suntec City Convention Center, for demonstrators.
The
Singapore meeting may be a perfect opportunity for the host
and official participants, but not for civil society.
Restrictive
legislation in Singapore continues to curb the freedom of
speech of its some four million citizens.
It seems
strange that the IMF and the World Bank did not take Singapore's
stance on protests into consideration when they selected
the country as host in Dubai in 2003.
It is
common for multilateral official meetings, like those of
the World Trade Organisation (WTO), to be accompanied by
parallel meetings of NGOs or separate sessions with NGOs
and the multilateral organisations.
Sutanto's
decision to allow the NGOs to meet in Batam to counter the
IMF-World Bank meeting in Singapore is praiseworthy.
Perhaps
this time the NGOs can be more appreciative of the positive
change demonstrated by the government.
Jakarta Post