Lee
Kuan Yew
Roots for democratic India
Compared to China, it instils less fear of aggression, reports
Sify, Indian news portal.
Dec 9, 2007
New
York - Democracy may obstruct India's development, but it
also makes the world look at this billion-strong nation
differently, with no fear of aggression vis-à-vis
China, says Singapore's Minister-Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.
Lee
also calls the efforts by India to forge a civilian nuclear
deal with the US in the nation's interest, but adds that
political opposition to it reflects the internal checks
and balances in place because of the democratic set up.
"There
is no fear that India has aggressive intentions," Lee
writes, soon after his recent return from New Delhi, which
he visited twice over the past month to address top executives
of J P Morgan and Citigroup.
"Two
of the largest US banks consider India to be a growth story
and are eager to service American and Indian companies.
I did not detect any anxiety over India becoming a problem
to the present world order," says Lee.
"Why
has China's peaceful rise, however, raised apprehensions?
Is it because India is a democracy in which numerous political
forces are constantly at work, making for an internal system
of checks and balances?"
In many
ways, Lee's remarks signal a transformation of his rather
critical views on India earlier, when he found it lacking
in good governance, especially in the area of hastening
the pace of economic reforms and inclusive growth.
He says
the world's upbeat attitude towards India is despite its
having a strong air force with the latest Sukhois and MiGs,
the best-trained army in Asia and the ability to project
its power across its borders farther than China.
He wonders
if this is due to India being surrounded by "states
in turmoil" and says a "bad outcome" in crisis-ridden
Pakistan would increase the terrorist threat to India and
that troubled Nepal was in a state of deep division.
"As
Pervez Musharraf is now an elected civilian president, he
won't have the same command over the army he has had as
army chief. And any other elected president will have even
less sway over the military," he says.
"Sri
Lanka is embroiled in an unending civil war, with the Tamil
Tigers carrying out endless suicide bombings. India obviously
has preoccupations enough to keep its focus fixed on its
border regions."
Lee
also queries if the world will respond in a similar fashion
to China were it to be a democracy as well, with multiple
parties and political power bases. He also questions if
such a China can grow at 9-12 percent per annum.
Such
a China may make big strides on economic, social and military
fronts, with more sophisticated capabilities on the ground,
sea and air. At the same time, it may also become a peer
competitor, if not an adversary, of the US, he warns.
"Indeed,
the US, the European Union and Japan root for India because
they want a better-balanced world, in which India approximates
China's weight," says Lee who is also referred to as
the father of modern-day Singapore.
Lee
says Indians hold such wide and divergent views that Nobel
laureate Amartya Sen entitled one of his books "The
Argumentative Indian" and adds that the little that
is published by the Chinese does not always disclose the
innermost thoughts.
He says
the West still has the phobia of "yellow peril"
for China, and refers to the "outrages of the Cultural
Revolution and the massacres in Tiananmen Square, not to
mention their strong feelings against Chinese government
censorship."
"China
will have to live with these hang-ups," he says.
"What
if India were well ahead of China? Would the Americans and
the Europeans be rooting for China? I doubt it," says
Lee, even as he speaks his mind on how he would like his
country and the region as a whole to view the scenario.
"Singapore
and Southeast Asia, sandwiched between the two behemoths,
need China and India to achieve a balanced relationship,
one that allows both to grow and prosper, pulling up the
rest of Asia - East, Southeast and South - with them."
http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14573077