Politics
A good opening up
Government loosens the gag that prevents freer public expressions
days after Lee Kuan Yew lashes out at multi-party democracy.
By Seah Chiang Nee.
Aug 23, 2008
FACED
with a host of new problems, the younger set of leaders
have surprised Singaporeans by announcing moves to ease
controls on politics and the Internet.
The
surprise is even greater when measured against the strong
criticism levelled only five days earlier by Lee Kuan
Yew at the younger generation’s enchantment with “multi-party
democracy”.
The
Minister Mentor had said: “They (the young generation)
say, oh, let’s have multi-party politics. Let’s
have different parties change and be in charge of the
government.
“Is
it that simple? You vote in a Division Three government,
not a Division One government, and the whole economy
will just subside within three, four years. Finished!”
Now
his 56-year-old son has announced moves that could – if
properly implemented – lead to more active multi-party
politics or even loosen the ruling People’s Action
Party’s hold on power.
Much
depends on a parallel move to define how the new media
will be managed.
But
the intention to open up, however slow it may be, is
apparent.
The
influential older Lee’s recent allegations against
Western democracy and a foreign conspiracy by liberals “to
do Singapore in” had raised concerns that a crackdown
on dissent might be ahead.
It
also comes as the government is facing increasing public
disquiet over super-inflation, unpopular policies and
the decline of billions of dollars in value through poor
investment.
The
Internet has been a leading voice of discontent concerning
these issues, particularly the government’s press
and political controls.
These
expressions have grown so loud that they had led people
to expect a political backlash from the authorities,
including cracking down on the Internet.
Instead,
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong appears to have done the
opposite.
In
his National Day TV address to the nation, a confident-looking
Hsien Loong, who was rumoured to be weakened from recent
illness, announced the following steps:
1.
Allowing outdoor demonstrations under conditions. “We
have to move away from this total ban and find ways for
people to let off steam a little bit more, but safely,” Lee
said. Dissidents will be allowed to protest at The Speakers’ Corner
after registering.
2.
By around the next general election (due in 2011), Singaporeans
will be allowed to post political videos and campaign
materials on the Internet, currently banned during the
campaigning period.
3.
Party political films, banned 10 years ago, may likely
be relaxed; an advisory panel may be set up to review
them, in the same way that normal films are now classified.
“Our
worry is because films are an emotive medium, passions
can get stirred up and people can get carried away,” Hsien
Loong explained.
“I
think this is a valid concern, but I don’t think
an outright ban is still sensible because this is how
people communicate on the Web in daily life.”
Although
Hsien Loong’s liberalisation intention had been
announced two years ago, his move to allow public protests
came as a pleasant surprise, given his father’s
presence.
The
Web community is generally pleased with it, although
it is far short of what it wants. The consensus view
has been: “It is a good start.”
However,
a few are reserving judgment pending follow-up action.
“Things
can turn out differently. The bureaucrats can still work
in various subtle controls to manage the Web,” one
said.
Despite
the contradiction, few observers see any significant
political or generational division between Lee Senior
and PM Lee and his younger ministers.
The
ruling PAP isn’t the sort where such a split can
happen – at least not when Kuan Yew is still around.
However,
it is likely that the senior Lee – given his mindset – isn’t
too pleased with it.
Any
move towards more public debate or a freer new media
would go against the grain of Lee Senior's ideology,
and likely to have been lengthily debated within the
Cabinet.
That
the prime minister has got his way augurs well for Singapore
in preparation for a post-Lee Kuan Yew future. The senior
Lee will be 85 next month.
Some
critics see the reasons as coming from outside, rather
than inside the PAP, which retains a tight control in
the republic.
One
is the flourishing Internet and the other is the emergence
of a new generation of Singaporeans who clamour for an
end to Kuan Yew’s soft authoritarianism.
The
shocking outcome of Malaysia’s March election,
with the big role played by the online community, is
believed to be exerting a strong influence here.
Singapore’s
digital plunge is greater than Malaysia’s. More
than three quarters of the population have Internet access.
Two-thirds
of Singaporeans in their 20s either blog or participate
in online forums; blogging is also common among the 30s
and 40s set.
This
has thrown into question the effectiveness of the government’s
control on the mainstream media.
More
Singaporeans are turning to online sources for information
and opinions.
With
the new move, it is clear that the government now wants
to use the Internet to win the hearts and minds of disaffected
youths.
The
outcome will be uncertain.
The
Internet – with its webcam and podcasts – is
just a channel of communication, albeit an effective
one. It is still the message that will decide who will
win or lose.
(This
is an expanded version of the article published in
The Star on Aug 23, 2008)