Inimitable
Lee
Some things don't change
His endearing quality is speaking his mind, but a bit of
Qatar talk wasn't too helpful to younger ministers trying
to justify group voting. By Seah Chiang Nee
Jan 15, 2006
During
his leadership, Singaporeans were used to Mr. Lee Kuan Yew's
outspoken way of articulating issues - whether domestic
or foreign - that had gained him many admirers, and quite
a few critics.
Where
others had feared to tread, Lee would wade in, raising subjects
considered too sensitive to talk about. I have covered him
for many years and had found this 'straight talk' a refreshing
approach.
It sometimes
ruffled feathers abroad when he commented about foreign
leaders or their countries.
This
had made him stand out among other leaders who hedged their
remarks. In his inimitable frankness, he could talk for
hours without boring his audience, sometimes saying things
unhelpful to his own party.
His
Qatar press briefing was the latest example.
Mr.
Lee chose to be frank about group voting at a time when
the policy of holding Group Representation Constituency
(GRC) elections has come under attack as an instrument to
help his ruling party perpetuate control.
One
of the opposition Workers Party's four manifesto points
for the coming election calls for it's dismantling.
The
governing party, however, says this is dangerous talk because
GRCs are necessary to ensure that Parliament represents
enough minority members needed to maintain racial harmony
in Singapore.
(Under
the system, 75 of the 84 MPs are voted in GRCs of three
to six candidates standing as a team in which Malay and
Indian candidates must be included according to their ethnic
ratio).
Critics
say GRC benefits the PAP and works against the opposition
parties, which lack its vast resources.
At Qatar,
however, Lee confirmed that slate voting is benefiting the
PAP in another way.
It has
helped new or weak candidates to win by teaming up under
a strong leader pulling them into Parliament when they might
have lost.
Mr Lee
told reporters that he hoped to bring in new people with
potential into his six-member Tanjong Pagar GRC - just like
he had done with relative newcomer Mr. Khaw Boon Wan in
the last poll.
'He
(Khaw) has established himself in the last four years,'
said Mr Lee of the Health Minister.
'I think
he will lead a GRC. He doesn't need me now. He needed me
then because he had no political exposure.'
Mr Lee
said the leadership was also looking for new more promising
candidates like Mr Khaw, and he (Kuan Yew) will carry 'at
least one of them' in his Tanjong Pagar GRC.
What
he said - that GRC helps him to protect inexperienced ones
- will make it hard for his ministers to convince people
that group voting is purely to ensure race stability.
One
web letter said that, despite the PAP explanation, many
Singaporeans had "seen through the scam for what it
is - a system to bring in dubious proteges who will never
win enough votes to get into Parliament on their own record.
Mr. Lee now confirmed this in Qatar."
Another,
mom teresa, said, "I had thought the inauguration of
the GRC was all about proportional ethnic representation?
Mr. Lee's statement suggests that it is "a political
incubator" for the ruling party.
Some
Singaporeans also noted what someone said was Mr. Lee's
Freudian slip.
Over
TV, he started saying that these were people "that
I was" (pause) before changing it to "that
the Prime Minister and his committee were looking
for."
Jan 25, 2005