Trends
- people
Shaping the new generation
Youths fast maturing under baptism of fire; it augurs well
for Singapore's future. By Seah Chiang Nee
Sept 16, 2003
THE process of
remaking Singapore may be going faster, but nowhere can
it match the speed that rising unemployment is changing
young Singaporeans.
The republic's
well-educated third generation, or 3-G, is undergoing a
baptism of fire that some people believe may augur well
for the future.
Pampered by affluence
and easy jobs, raised by maids and private tuition, many
of them now find themselves confronted by a harsh new reality
of having to fight for jobs like their peers elsewhere.
Look at the newspapers,
especially the classified sections, and you'll see just
how much life has changed for these unemployed tertiary-trained
youths.
Many have taken
to the simple but purest form of entrepreneurship by buying
and selling.
The popular products
are used hand-phones, laptops and computer-related parts,
digital cameras, watches, comic books, pawnshop tickets
- just about anything with a value.
Dealers in second-hand
mobile phone and PC parts are flourishing, providing a useful
service to bargain hunters. They sell goods from ring-tones
and screensavers to used peripherals like PDAs, flat-screen
monitors and hard disks at a fraction of the costs.
Many of them operate with just a name and a contact number.
Other Singaporeans
teach - or learn - a fast course in reflexology to do house
calls or open up computer clinics.
Some take up
courses in systematic domestic-help work, car wash, photography
workshops, haircutting, mostly to start their own one-man
business that used to be done by foreign workers.
And, of course,
there has been a sudden interest in cooking skills - just
in case.
The flurry is
not a response to the government's promotion of entrepreneurship
but a need for survival.
The rapid decline
of opportunities has sharply raised the number of jobless
graduates, forcing thousands to abandon the traditional
career-building paths.
In the past,
all Singaporeans had to do was to study hard, get a professional
degree and leave the rest to the government. Today they
can no longer depend on the government for jobs; they have
to rely on themselves to make their own living.
However, not
everyone is capable of doing this. Some still rely on their
parents.
Recently, I asked a friend what his daughter was doing three
years after graduating. He replied: "She's helping
me in my business."
The son of a
former neighbour who returned seven months ago from Australia
with a master's degree in mass communication is still jobless
despite the mother's advice to "get any job at any
pay."
Meanwhile, they
survive on parental allowance.
Stories of people
with initiative are given prominence in the local press:
degree-holders compelled to take up jobs below their qualifications,
like a PhD doing temp work as an estate inspector.
The New Paper
reported the plight of Joyce Low, 22, who graduated in business
and commerce (majoring in international business) with top
honours in Australia's Monash University.
She had distinctions
in seven subjects and higher distinctions in six others,
receiving the Golden Key Honours Society award.
After returning,
she spent months of abortive search for work, including
being turned down twice for work as a receptionist. Three
sales representative jobs that she did not take up were
for door-to-door salespersons.
"When I
was in Australia, I hardly went out and spent most of the
time studying," Joyce said. She had expected to earn
S$3,000 a month by the age of 30 and planned to buy a condo
and a car.
"Now I'll
probably have to work much longer, maybe 10 years, and work
twice as hard to achieve those dreams," she told the
newspaper.
But amid the
pain arise new hopes. It is forcing a growing number of
unemployed youths to move into various enterprises.
Not all will
succeed but the experience will be invaluable to mould the
3-G into a more self-reliant lot.
During his National
Day speech, Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong praised the spirit
of the US-trained female graduate who became a hawker selling
chestnuts.
Recently, three
IT graduates succeeded in building their fruits and vegetables
business (started in 1999 after the dot.com bubble burst)
into a flourishing S$3mil venture.
Then there was
the case of Victor Hoo, the coffin maker. The 34-year-old
has an honours degree in Economics from the University of
London and a Diploma in Computer Science from a local polytechnic.
This new spirit
is shaping a stronger generation. But the present is no
bed of roses.
In an address to university students, Deputy Prime Minister
Lee Hsien Loong asked whether Singapore's success would
outlive its founders.
"Or will
Singapore melt away in the sea of globalisation, and revert
to being a sleepy town or a fishing village?"
His was the latest
in a string of statements from senior members of the ruling
People's Action Party that suggest the younger generation
risks having little in the way of a backbone.
The debate started
last year when PM Goh chastised 20-somethings. "They
grew up with a silver spoon in their mouth, a maid at their
beck and call, and a car to bring them around."
Lee, who is due
to take over as prime minister within the next two years,
said the country was at a turning point. Young people in
neighbouring states had more drive, he warned.
"All around
us, there are many for whom life has not been so comfortable.
But this has given them a tremendous fire in the belly and
eagerness to learn," he said.
"Singaporeans
have to compete against them, and had better prepare themselves
for the race."
Going by present
trends, the third generation will emerge from Singapore's
current transition a more self-reliant, capable lot. This
has long-term repercussions for Singapore's politics.
For starters,
the society's critical stance against people who leave Singapore
to work abroad will change. Goh threw a challenge to Singaporeans
to declare if they were "stayers or quitters."
Unable to find
work at home, more Singaporeans will look for jobs abroad,
especially in China, India and other booming countries.
As the government's
ability to provide meaningful jobs declines, young Singaporeans
are likely to become politically more assertive.
(This article was first published in Sunday Star on
Sept 14, 2003).