Moral
growth
Lagging behind economy
Crooked
lawyers, cheating doctors, more Jeckyl & Hyde housewives
assaulting maids, teenage crime up 55%. Whats happening
to this highly-educated citizenry?
By Seah Chiang Nee.
Feb 24, 2003
DOCTORS
under investigation for tax evasion, screamed a recent headline
in Singapore's newspapers, reporting an extensive check
on earnings of private doctors.
A private specialist had failed to declare income of more
than S$3mil between 1997 and 1998, and owed S$822,000 in
tax. He was jailed four weeks and fined S$2.4mil, four times
the amount due.
This was soon followed by another headline: "Lawyers
probed in illegal deals involving money-lenders."
Earlier, a foreign news agency had reported: "Mass
cheating students put computer skills to new use."
Singapore students may have a reputation for being computer
savvy, but misuse of the talent has led to the city-state's
biggest case of cheating in a national exam, it said.
Some 158 students in 28 schools were caught using their
basic computer skills to illicitly get answers in an office
administration exam.
A coffee-shop talking point was a series of maid abuses
so vicious that compelled the courts to imprison the offending
employers.
One of them was a woman who holds an MBA from the University
of Hull. She was jailed a year for attacking her Filipino
maid over several months, leaving hundreds of scars all
over the victim's body.
Then there was the infamous Everitt Road decade-long neighbourhood
quarrel that made prime-time national television.
One of the scenes shows the daughter, a teacher with a doctorate
in life sciences, standing next to her mother and shouting
across to the neighbours: "You see, this is diamond?
You can buy or not? You got money to buy?"
The list of flawed professionals can go on but readers will
get the point.
An increasing number of highly educated Singaporeans are
finding themselves on the wrong side of the law.
Singapore is finding out - like other advanced cities -
that better education does not mean higher morals or better
ethics. It should, but it doesn't.
Since 1965, when Singapore became independent, the profile
of its people has changed principally because of a hell-bent
pursuit of education by the government and by parents.
For some years now, some 60% of youths were coming out with
a degree or diploma. This has transformed Singapore into
a developed country at a pace that matched those of war-ravaged
Japan and Germany.
But the speed is achieved at a social price. The republic's
rapid economic progress is no way matched by its social
development.
With so many instances of flawed lawyers and doctors, cheating
students or soccer players indulging in illegal betting,
people are beginning to ask if Singapore Inc has not missed
out something important.
There's a feeling that in its economic haste, the whole
society - both the government (in particular the education
system) and parents - have fallen short in efforts on character
building.
Singaporean parents, by and large, are serious and efficient;
that's easy to see. However, they are better at work than
in parenting that has, in this Internet world, long become
one of the toughest tasks in the world.
Many are too involved with careers than with their children's
upbringing.
Latest statistics, released last month, show some 4,000
youngsters were arrested for various crimes last year, a
sharp 49% jump from the 2,500 in 2001.
Most were petty offences such as theft and shoplifting,
or being members of street gangs and fighting.
To put it in perspective, the juvenile problem here is less
serious than in most Western cities. Unlike in poorer cities,
juvenile crimes here are not generally caused by poverty.
"In many cases, it happens because there is lack of
parental supervision and the youths are bored," said
a lawyer involved in juvenile cases.
He knew of a mother who was shocked to learn that her "obedient"
son was a gang member with tattoos all over his back.
In most two-income families, the parents leave their children's
welfare to the care of maids. Only a few of them are prepared
for this responsibility.
Several days ago, the Straits Times ran a glaring headline
with a powerful message - and warning. It says: "I
hate you, mum; I want the maid." It is a voice of despair
by kids in their early teens.
A sub-heading says: "One child sleeps with maid's T-shirt;
others lie, play truant and steal because parents' absence
creates emotional void."
At the same time, the Internet has introduced to youths
a new world of opportunities - and dangers. Films and TV
expose them to a level of violence and sex the previous
generation never had.
For decades, the education system, preoccupied with a single-minded
goal of producing technicians, engineers and managers for
the economy, provided little solution.
Its teachers were too pressurised by tight school syllabuses
and pursuit of school ranking that they paid no - or low
- priority to the other objective of producing loyal, upright
citizens for the nation.
Actually Singapore's schools churn out generally law-abiding,
clean-living people, maybe a bit too materialistic or self-centred.
And the number of crooked professionals, despite the recent
headlines, is still low.
But in recent times, we have repeatedly seen rational Singaporeans,
evidently educated in good schools and raised in middle-class
homes, violently abusing their maids.
It's inexplicable; like Dr Jekyl and Mr Hyde.
There have been cases of children throwing pets out of high
buildings, scalding kittens with boiling water or teens
beating up someone they accuse of "staring" at
them.
We have girls who steal perfumes and scarves from department
stores because they can't afford to buy them and their friends
have them.
Some old-timers say: Bring back the old school system with
dedicated teachers. That'll fill today's major needs. Teachers
with a mission who speak of, and showed, care in part of
everyday lessons.
Everyone has his or her stories. I remember mine from my
old missionary school, a teacher with a rough voice who
taught us that we should "Live and let (other people)
live" or "Spread a bit of sunshine" or care
for the needy or love of this migrant nation.
This may sound too simplistic in today's cynical, materialistic
world, but the messages did a lot to mould young characters
like my classmates and me.
(This article was posted in Sunday Star on Feb 23, 2003.)