Sense
of shame,
Where's it gone?
Public behaviour indicates young people are losing their
sense of shame.By Seah Chiang Nee
Aug 26, 2001
An irate
man once invaded the office of the defunct Singapore Monitor,
of which I was editor, to look for a photographer so that
he could rearrange his face.
He was
really, really angry. He had just been convicted and fined
for slapping his father over money and the offending cameraman
had snapped his picture outside the court house.
At all
costs, he made it hysterically clear to us, he must stop
his picture from being published.
Among
the Chinese, beating up parents is one big bad crime and
no miscreant would like his picture published for doing.
After a lot of shouting and pushing, police escorted him
out.
That
was in the early 80s.
Several
years earlier, I had accompanied Mr. Lee Kuan Yew (then
prime minister) on a visit to (West) Germany where I found
myself seated next to a couple of German industrialists.
It was
a state banquet and we were talking about unemployment dole.
One businessman told me that only one out of two jobless
actually collected the benefits.
"The
rest are too ashamed to come and queue up in an unemployed
line even for the money," he explained.
We were
to read more about this powerful sense of shame during the
1997 financial crisis when hundreds or thousands of middle-aged
Japanese and Koreans lost their jobs.
Many
of them kept it a secret from the families. For months,
they pretended they were still working but spent their time
outside looking for work.
In some
societies, to be jobless was cause for shame. It implied
the person was incapable; to line up palm-outstretched for
money because of it was humiliation.
But
such perceptions, I noticed, was not widespread in countries
like Britain and Australia even in those days. Today,they
have become weaker among the young generation - anywhere.
Changing values are reducing the sense of shame.
A strong
work culture in Germany had propelled a war-ravaged country
to the status of becing the world's third most powerful
economy in a quarter century.
Today
the picture is not so rosy. Just how changed the new generation
of Germans is from their parents? Read this recent International
Herald Tribute article (in part):-
Germany
Tackles Abuses by Jobless
Campaign aims at able-bodied but "lazy" recipients
of aid.
Bonn
- It's an old trick; Chug a beer just before the job interview.
That faint whiff of alcohol on your breath all but ensures
that the job goes to someone else.
Some
Germans routinely undertake such ploys to retain their monthly
unemployment benefits while going through the motions of
an obligatory job search.
A country
that prides itself on industry and discipline has long tolerated
the abuse of its well-funded safety net for needy labourers.
But
now Germans suddenly seem a lot less generous, and many
want to change the old ways. Chancellor Gerhad Schroeder
railed last month against what he called the "lazy"
but able-bodied welfare recipients.
His
comments have ignited an emotional debate about kicking
alleged freeloaders off the unemployment rolls."
Shame,
if not excessive, is not all bad. It often keeps many of
us on the straight and narrow.
In fact,
the government has often resorted to its use as a punishment
for wrongdoing. The Corrective Work Orders making serious
litterbugs wear a humiliating coat to clean roads for up
to 12 hours is one form.
The
public naming of government scholars who broke their bonds
is another.
Several
years ago, TV was allowed into the courtrooms to film proceedings
in an effort to publicly shame some types of offenders as
deterrent to others. However, public reaction was against
it and the practice stopped.
Nowhere
is the debate more heated than in USA, which has the biggest
prison population in the world.
Since
1995, conservative Americans had been demanding criminals
to suffer shame with punishment. And it is making a comeback,
says Dan Kahan, Assistant Professor in the University of
Chicago Law School.
For
example, Kahan cites penalties including a contemporary
version of the stocks-some communities require offenders
to stand in public spaces such as the local courthouse with
signs describing their offences. Other shaming punishments
have included:
* Ordering
convicted burglars to allow their victims to come into their
homes and take anything they wanted.
* Requiring
offenders to apologise - on their hands and knees in Maryland
- for their crimes.
* Requiring
parents of children who violate the town curfew to place
a bumper sticker on their car that says "My children
are not my responsibility. They are yours."
* Publishing
the names of offenders in newspapers or on billboards listing
the names and the offences - including the offence of soliciting
a prostitute.
* Requiring
thieves to wear T-shirts or brightly coloured bracelets
announcing their crimes. One judge ordered a woman to wear
a sign declaring "I am a convicted child molester."
Conventional
alternatives are defective because they aren't shameful
enough," he says.
(In
Gulfport, Mississippi, a circuit judge sentenced a burglar
to a three-day sentence, which included standing on a street
corner for three hours with a sign that reads: "I'm
a convicted thief.")
Others
argue against using this weapon to punish because it can
cause irreparable emotional harm to a person long after
the sentence.
Psychologists
say that shamed people can develop poor self-esteem, dysfunctional
characteristics or even turned to serious crime. (Some argue
the other way around - the more self-esteem, the more the
person feels shame.)
One
said: "Some are constantly ready to see or point out
the weaknesses of others, or often find themselves furious--inwardly
or outwardly -- over the slightest perceived affront to
themselves or to their dignity."
These
refer to more extreme forms of shaming offenders. There
is no need to follow suit here since crime is not too threatening.
Singapore
has, however, opted for less harsher methods, which should
continue because the benefits outdo the harm - even though
the result may be less effective.
(Aug
30 - Latest News on shaming: South Korea carried out a controversial
plan today to post the names of convicted sex offenders
on a government Web site, causing a Web traffic jam in the
world's most wired nation. The Commission on Youth Protection
posted the names, ages, occupations and addresses of 169
people convicted of crimes including rape and sex with minors
- a move which had women's activists cheering and civil
rights experts crying foul.)
Seah Chiang Nee