School
streaming
Shaping elitist mindset
Streaming helps create arrogant elitism among students.
By Seah Chiang Nee.
Feb 15, 2004
WHAT
began as a jealous boy-girl dating complaint has developed
into a full-blown Internet debate that highlights the divisive
impact of Singapore's school ranking system.
It was
an innocuous message of a student from the elite Raffles
Girls' School dating a boy from an under-achieving neighbourhood
school.
Few
people could have anticipated anything worth to comment
about, but it provoked a Raffles Junior College student
- RJCdude - to call on lower-ranking students to "quit
trying to climb the social ladder by dating students from
top schools."
The
explosive discussion pitched the present, and former, students
of top-ranking schools against those of neighbourhood schools,
to which average or below-average students generally are
streamed.
They
end up - at best - with a diploma rather than a university
degree.
The Web debate stretched over a period of four months, attracting
more than 400 postings in two chatsites.
Cynic,
who suggested that the couple break up, said: "It's
not going to work out. She's going to be ashamed of introducing
him to her friends and her family."
What
about the future? he asked. "Will he be happy wallowing
in her shadow when she starts earning three times more than
him? Inferiority complex will soon kick in.
"There
also will be a great communication problem. I mean, what
has a graduate from Cornell in common with Ah Beng on the
streets?"
Cordonbluu
wrote of the different social class and intellectual mentalities
and the ability to provide.
"The
one weaker in academics will not be able to provide nourishment
for the mind and cannot engage in intelligent discussion
on politics, for example," he said.
"And
the more intelligent one will probably have to lower his/her
standards and eventually will degenerate to the same level."
He added
this bombshell: "We are afraid of genetic dilution."
"Leave
the RGS girl alone-lah! Leave her to other high-flying guys.
It's good to know one's limits once in a while," declared
Get Real.
One
forum participant said the Raffles schoolgirl was earmarked
for higher things in life, so the guy should not spoil it
for her.
Another
"elite" student, Super-infector, said he would
never go out with a girl from a neighbourhood school because
of "social and intellectual disparity." Declared
another: "You guys should know your place in society."
But
underneath all the juvenile froth is something more important
to the nation.
It raises a crucial question about character-building of
our top students.
While
the education system can produce excellent engineers and
scientists, can the same be said of raising potential leaders
who are sensitive to society's needs?
The
views of some of Singapore's "elite" students
are revealing and disturbing. They lend weight to an observation
by some foreigners that the new generation of Singaporeans
is arrogant and self-centred.
One
is the former Chinese ambassador here, Chen Bioliu, who
said Singaporeans need to shed their "arrogance"
and "air of superiority" if they were to further
improve relations with China.
According to her, some Singapo- reans, with their superiority
in English, tend to look down on Chinese nationals.
Her
comment reflects the fears of some leaders who have been
warning people they must do more to drop the "ugly
Singaporean" image that some neighbouring countries
have of them.
One
of Singapore's (retired) top bureaucrats, Ngiam Tong Dow,
recently said some civil servants had behaved like mini-Lee
Kuan Yews but without his achievements.
The
current crop of highly-paid bureaucrats comes from elite
colleges through government scholarships to study in the
best universities.
The
consistent top two have been Raffles Junior College and
Hwa Chong Junior College.
Their academic results have been breathtaking because the
crème de la crème in secondary schools scramble
to study there.
Some
80% of all government and government-linked scholarship
awardees are from the top five junior colleges (2002) -
Raffles, Hwa Chong, Victoria, National and Temasek.
But
if the debate is reflective of our best scholars and potential
leaders, it doesn't offer much hope for optimism in the
future.
Many
come across as arrogant and self-centred, looking down on
others who are less academically capable. They seem to have
a jaundiced view of life, believing that their distinctions
somehow guarantee them success.
Not
all the "elite" ex-students, of course, share
this arrogance; in fact a few condemn the arguments. But
there are enough of those who agree with RJCdude.
If they
are insensitive to the less capable in college, can they
be depended upon to provide leadership and compassion to
the needy when they become adults?
Ultimately,
the question arises as to whether the ranking system is
shaping an elitist mentality, breeding a class division
in Singapore.
Sgstvoy,
who admits he came from a top school, argues that students
with limited capacity, or the lower class, "exist for
the service of the upper class."
To the
lesser students, he advised: "Know your limits and
develop your other niche abilities for I do believe an academically
inept person will have other abilities that may not be valued
by the current system."
The
arguments against these views were overwhelming, describing
them as "worrying" - which explains why the government
is bringing in foreign talent.
"No
creativity, no analytical skill, arrogant and think too
highly of themselves but yet is in fact a pathetic bunch
who live in their own small little world. This is really
sad," one declared.
"You
guys are terribly childish," said Jenn. "If you
think you're going to make it big with that attitude, you're
in for a big surprise."
In the
working world, nobody cares what college you come from,
only how well you perform, says another.
"This
thread has gotten out of control. The school ranking system
has gone all wrong."
Finally, from ex-elite ExRGS: "One day when these arrogant
bigots have to step out into the real world where no one
knows what your old school name means, you will finally
learn to grow up."
(This article was first published in Sunday Star, Feb
15, 2004)