Public
A confidence hole
Public worries about Singapore’s big investment in
Merrill Lynch and other troubled banks remain very high.
By Seah Chiang Nee.
Aug 1, 2008
Despite its success in leveraging down its
investment, Singaporeans are generally very concerned about
the state of their state investments in Merrill Lynch –
and other deeply troubled banks.
Of late spotlight has fallen on Merrill
Lynch (ML), the badly hit US bank-brokerage firm, in which
Temasek Holding has increased its stake – but succeeded
in paring away its paper loss of US$2.5b.
Singaporeans I spoke to have expressed views
on ML and the other foreign banks that I sum up as follows:
It was premature, the judgment was poor and the timing horribly
ill timed, but although it is badly battered it might be
too early to dismiss it as a gone cae.
Some optimists agree with Temasek that the
bank – like the others – will eventually survive
the US and global financial crisis and return to its old
glory.
“It’s a matter of time and staying
power,” said one stock speculator.
These are the minority, though.
In the face of a lack of any substantial
statement from Temasek on its current problems or future
strategy to face the world crisis, people are generally
expecting the worst.
The public broadly feels let down and believes
Temasek could lose money or be forced to have Singaporeans’
hard-earned money tied up for years and years on its unprofitable
bank investments.
Some are angry; others are desperately worried
about their reserves, if not about losing part of them,
at least in lost opportunities>
They fear this could lead the government
to come up with more revenue-raising measures to strengthen
the reserves, higher public fees or more expensive publics
flats.
A few are wondering whether, in the event
of the deal failing, whether it may adversely affect the
rule of the People’s Action Party (PAP).
Some of the fears about their savings are
exaggerated, but they very real, which requires government
clarification and assurance.
The following is a cross section of recent
online comments: -
Comments
Source: Online Citizen
Dr Syed Alwi
The PAP better pray that this investment deal works out!
If it fails - I think people will skin the PAP folks alive!
ahsayman
I'm no economist, so Temasek was savvy enough, but what
if Merril Lynch goes under? We still get our money back
in 30 years? Or do we move on again?
Daniel
Only a naive and innocent chap will accept a 30 years investment.
Bear Solo
Dr Syed, don't hope for the people to skin PAP alive, because
most Singaporeans don't know and/or don't care. This practice
of non-transparent dealings suits PAP just fine.
hongjun
Whenever a stock falls by 50%, we need 100% rise to get
it back to the original buy price. I think we need to pray
really hard to make sure it will recover!
mr kit
Can you smell all that tax money burning in the air? All
the blood sweat and tears of the common man are in it? Sweet
isn’t it?
Harrison
Not too long ago, Ho Ching was conferred as among the most
powerful women. Now, we understand the real reason behind
this dubious and sarcastic award that she so humbly accepted.
The power to lose multi-billions and still get paid multi-millions
without being questioned by the board of Temasek Holdings.
This is not only powerful but ridiculously so.
lol
(The leaders) made the wrong bet. We can only depend on
the foreign press!
dumbspg
Please tell me, if half of our foreign reserves were to
be lost, what would our dollar be worth then? Will we have
to pay more for our mortgages? Will inflation hit the roof?
I’m so worried.
Maybe, maybe we should give more support to the Minister
Mentor, Senior Min8ister, Prime Minister and Ho Ching Oh!
I forgot Mah Bow Tan. You know whatever portfolio he holds,
he always makesmoney, I think he should assist Ms Ho and
Temasek. Thank you.
Yuchengko
Interesting food for thought. AT might have played up the
part on CIC & GIC getting conned. But the lack of due
diligence is frightening. Throwing good money after bad?
My parents always cautioned there won’t be big frogs
all over town for you to grab - good things aren’t
easily available. If there is ever to be a turnaround, it
will be a long time waiting. Good luck everybody!
rafi
I think it is meaningless for people without economic and
financial expertise, like us, to judge whether it is a sound
investment.
Sorry, but I think it’s not strong enough to conclude
that the investment decision is bad one over a longer term.
I do not have indisputable evidence that it is good either.
But I want to say that it’s simply impossible for
non-experts to judge, and I prefer to withhold judgments.
But that’s an entirely a different question altogether
on how sovereign funds should be utilized, and this issue
not specific to Singapore only.
Daniel
quote “I think it is meaningless for people without
economic and financial expertise, like us, to judge whether
it is a sound investment.”
Even you ask a financial expert, they will tell you the
same thing. It is a gamble. Whatever condition they put
to hedge the risk is no excuses for gambling. There is only
a Win and Lose in term of dollars.
Question is why is the government gambling on frail banks
and not on citizens, and why government gambling on building
images and not on substances? Why not treat the citizen
better instead as economic slaves?
Dr Syed Alwi
To me - the issue is NOT about the merits and demerits of
the investments. To me the issue is one of values and priorities.
Why is it that the Government REFUSES to help the lower
and middle income groups with some subsidies in this time
of hardship - but yet - the Government is completely willing
to risk losing billions of dollars of public money in risky
and controversial investments?
(from OnLineCitizen forums)