Singapore
Changing the future
Moving into casinos (no stopping at two), pop culture, etc
is first real step away from Kuan Yew era. By Seah Chiang
Nee
Apr 24, 2005
SINGAPORE
is often likened to crystal clear water which should have
attracted a lot of fish but actually has not. In short,
it's efficient and wholesome, but too boring.
That
this "tired" image of sameness was bad for tourism
was brainstormed for years but no significant solution emerged
until last week.
When
action came, it was big. The government approved the establishment
of two mega casino resorts in Singapore at a cost of S$5bil
that will rank as the biggest property development here.
The
grandeur of the scheme is breathtaking, providing 35,000
jobs and annual revenue of S$1bil. But more significant
is its impact on the future of Singapore and its people.
It marks
a Rubicon crossing of sorts that would hasten Singapore's
advent as a cosmopolitan city.
The
decision is seen as its first real step away from the Lee
Kuan Yew era, sanctioned by him, of course.
Until
then, the city had been tinkering with, rather than reinventing,
the state to meet the tough competition from China and India.
Prime
Minister Lee Hsien Loong said the resorts would feature
ritzy hotels, family entertainment, restaurants, convention
centres and museums at two sites - and, of course, casino
gambling.
The
battle was tough. Singapore is modelled by its conservative
founding father.
After
four decades of opposition to casinos, many of its 4.3 million
people and the ruling People's Action Party fear that society's
fabric and family value will be undermined by it.
Lee
Kuan Yew, now 81, had to pitch in to persuade them to reverse
history. He said having casinos was bad but not having them
was even worse. Investors will build them elsewhere. Besides,
Singaporeans gamble away S$2bil in overseas casinos every
year.
Lee
said that if Singapore rejected the idea after deliberating
it for a year, it would be sending the world the wrong message
"that we want to stay put, to remain the same old Singapore,
a neat and tidy place with ... no this, no that, not a fun
place".
To be
clean, efficient and wholesome in today's world is not enough,
he said.
Won't stop at two
Will
it stop at two? Probably not. With the ban lifted, no one
can dismiss the possibility of more casinos here after a
decent interval if the current projects succeed.
Flourishing
casino-city Las Vegas (population 1.5 million) has 30 million
tourists, Macau has 17 casinos and 17 million tourists,
while Genting has 11 million visitors a year.
By comparison,
Singapore has only 8.5 million tourists, so casino resorts
have room to grow.
Singapore
will also likely expand into pop culture that Lee Kuan Yew
rued having neglected during his time. What he says today
has a tradition of coming true tomorrow.
While
mapping a first-world city, Lee said he had planned a cultured
place, with libraries, theatres and museums but had left
out pop culture. "I didn't see that the money was in
pop culture," he said.
He personally could not understand the lure of pop singers
or MTV programmes, "but that's not the point".
"The
point is, it attracts millions of young viewers around the
world, and there is big business in this. So from a business
point of view, whether I like it or not, I should be - the
government should be - interested in this," he said.
(Japan's
pop culture covers a wide range of creative activities like
teen fashion, music, movies, TV, comics, soft toys, video
games, etc, that helped lift its economy.)
"I
think we made a mistake in not building a Formula One course,"
Lee also said. "I think I was dim-witted then."
Lee
said he could not understand the allure of Formula One Grand
Prix events but saw that hosting these races brought along
economic spin-offs to the host countries.
"Driving
around and then going into the pits; after that, changing
the tyres and revving out again ... makes no sense to me,"
Lee said.
The
anxiety over casinos and the possible entry into pop culture
is tinged with an air of optimism. People are feeling better.
In recent
years, as the economy declined - along with jobs and personal
assets - some Singaporeans, including graduates, began to
lose confidence about their future.
More
Singaporeans are still migrating to greener - and more exciting
- pastures.
Achieving
the status of cities like New York, London or Tokyo as Singapore
aspires would require moving away from the Kuan Yew era,
of which many older PAP leaders are firmly attached to.
Until
the 11th hour, the cabinet was split on the casino. The
older ministers who had spent the most time with Lee were
the most reluctant to nod their heads. Members of Parliament
were also divided.
For
several years, Singapore had strived to remake itself as
fundamentals turned against it, but there was more big planning
than real changes.
A few areas like Research and Life Sciences have succeeded
beyond expectation but did not create sufficient jobs to
maintain Singapore's previous wealth.
The
government will announce the successful resort operators
in December. The 11 aspirants include the world's most luxurious
casino operators from the United States, Australia, South
Africa and Malaysia.
The
minister mentor said he found Genting Bhd's two-casino proposal
the most interesting of all. Lee said he had been briefed
on all of them, including Harrah's and MGM Mirage.
"The
most interesting for me was Genting (partnering Star Cruises
Ltd) putting two bids," said Lee. One is for Marina
Bay and the other, Sentosa island.
It is
teaming up with Universal Studios, theme parks and the entertainment
giant behind movie franchises such as The Mummy and Jurassic
Park.
The
Malaysian plan is to commit S$3bil to build an integrated
casino resort and cruise ship centre in the Marina Bay area.
"I
ask myself 'What does this mean?' That they must be prepared
to sink S$5bil to S$6bil and watch their investments in
Genting become secondary as we draw in the crowds,"
said Lee.
Eight
of them are seen to have the best odds to build what US
investment bank Merrill Lynch says could be the world's
most expensive casinos.
Lee,
who had once said that Singapore might not be around in
50 years, appears more confident about the future.
It could,
he now believes, emerge by 2030 as a vibrant economy of
six to seven million people.
(The
article was published in The Sunday Star on Apr 24, 2005)