Fare
(and other) hikes
add to gloom
Wages,
rents, consumption down, unemployment up, so why are monopolistic
public transport fares being raised? By Seah Chiang Nee
June 28, 2002
STILL trapped in economic hardship and record unemployment,
Singaporeans are being hit with another whammy higher
parking fees, public transport fares and probably a lot
more.
In line for imminent increases are local telephone rates
and electronic-assessed road usage.
Then
on Dec 1, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) will go up from
3 percent to 5 percent, and this will give a bigger headache
to hard-pressed Singaporeans.
These
increases will affect every home or business in Singapore,
exerting an upward pressure on other prices.
Last
week, mass transit, light rail and bus operators were permitted
by the government, which owns 62 percent of the operating
company Singapore MRT, to increase fares by 3 to 5 cents
per trip with effect from July 1. Some trips will increase
by up to 10 cents.
A high
87 percent of Singaporeans who rely on public transport,
given the high costs of operating a car, reacted with predictable
anger.
(Damage control centres on an explanation that it is better
to raise fares a bit at a time rather than by a big amount
in a longer period.)
That
became worse recently when the authorities made parking
in housing board estates more expensive.
And
soon road usage will cost more when the Electronic Road
Pricing system pushes its charges higher.
Now
comes another piece of bad news. Singtel looks set to receive
the official nod to raise local phone rates by, according
to unconfirmed reports, as much as 50 percent.
Southeast
Asias biggest telco (67.5 percent government-owned)
is going through a bad patch.
Run
by Lee Hsien Yang, youngest son of Senior Minister Lee Kuan
Yew, Singtel recently reported a 19 percent decline in net
profits for the year to March 31. Its shares have fallen
to an all-time low of about S$1.40.
Further
depressing Singaporeans was the downgrading of its credit
rating by Moodys Investor Services following its S$14bil
purchase of Australian telco, Optus.
For
the 2002 fiscal year, the company went from a net cash position
of S$3.1bil to a net debt of S$9.89bil.
Based
on its current financial structure, it will be very difficult
for it to reduce its debt significantly, said a Singaporean
analyst.
Raising
local phone rates is bound to provoke another round of public
criticism. Singaporean phone-users will see it as an effort
to make them pay to finance Singtels adventures abroad.
All
these increases couldnt have come at a worse time.
During
the past couple of years, workers had been caught in the
grip of an economic crisis, with spending power reduced
through wage freezes and, in many cases, pay cuts.
Bankruptcies
and unemployment are up, sales are down and with property
and share prices in the doldrums, there is much to cry over
even without a higher cost of living.
Understandably,
they have raised a great deal of public bitterness. To begin
with, it is highly unusual to see such hikes in times of
poor consumer demand, reduced wages, rents and generally
lower business costs.
In such
conditions, company executives are normally reluctant to
increase prices but Singapore MRT Ltd is a 73 percent government-owned
monopoly.
Last
year its net profits fell from S$102.8mil to S$56.8mil due
to mainly higher investment and other costs.
Officials
often say that Singaporeans would have to pay if they want
to enjoy a world-class transport system. Commuters, however,
feel they are being made to pay for fanciful luxury investments
that they neither need nor ask for in times of recession.
Bus
and train operators recently installed a S$100mil e-zine
cash card system similar to what Malaysians use. These operations
have installed computer screens that provide information
on arrival times of all trains or buses.
Meanwhile,
buses recently installed television sets to entertain commuters
and the bus interchange at Toa Payoh (monthly electric bill:
S$30,000) has been air-conditioned.
Feeling
victimised, some commuters are calling for a freeing of
the public transport monopoly to allow other players into
the arena to compete..
Theres
little chance of that happening soon. It was not long ago
that the two bus companies and the mass transit firm had
merged into one big corporation.
It has
defended its price hike, the second since June 2000, saying
it has done its best to control costs. But many Singaporeans
disagree, saying these companies are not losing money but
merely making lower profits.
The
whole thing has highlighted once again the governments
powerful hand in business.
The
profit of this monopoly is lower, expectedly so because
theres a recession, said a business management
undergraduate.
Why
cant a government-linked company take a knock during
a downturn like everybody else without being helped by a
price hike?
In an
online forum, Legionaire said: Bad move.
This one really alienates most Singaporeans. The hikes will
compound the plight of an already demoralised populace.
Kucheech,
another forum participant, simply said: Are our voices
really heard? I have no mouth and I must scream!
But
there are a few who moderated the debate.
Be
fair to them. It's just a few dollars a month. The operators
applied for more but the government approved only a small
amount, declared one of them.
The
intensity of the opposition was realised at the beginning
by strong labour movement National Trades Union Congress
(NTUC) that said the timing was not right.
The
Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) also opposed the
move because of the weak economic environment.
Although
there are signs the economy is picking up, unemployment
still remains high and the unemployed workers continue to
face grim prospects, it said.
The
biggest problem is the trend of declining passengers in
public transport.
Buses
and the mass rapid transit have been losing passengers by
1 percent or 2 percent a year, which implies that fares
at least will rise every two years. Bus passengers fell
by 3 percent last year.
The
rise in public transport, and eventually in telephone charges,
will exert pressure on the cost of almost everything else
except in wages. The job market is still weak.
It will
also raise the cost of doing business in Singapore, something
the government is working hard to cut down. (
This
article was first published in The Star, Malaysia on June
23, 2002)