Foreigners
Throwing the doors open
Allowing service employers to bring in one foreigner for
every Singaporean they employ could redirect the future
direction of Singapore. By Seah Chiang nee.
July 18, 2009
Many
Singaporeans - like manager Joyce Ng - may be forgiven for
asking: “Where is the job crisis? Is the recession
for real?”
Despite
the recession and a large loss of jobs, Ng, who runs The
Whisky Store, was having anything but an easy time when
she tried last month to hire one local worker
She
ran six advertisements and got two responses, both persons
quit after a trial.
Her
complaint is shared by other employers who say that the
Singaporean service worker is becoming a disappearing breed
despite the downturn.
Singaporeans,
including the newly-retrenched, appear reluctant to take
up many types of service work, especially in eating places,
shops and public transport.
Yet
these are places that seem to be showing some new life.
The Sunday crowds are back in impressive numbers, eating
and shopping, as if the crisis is just a memory, and some
bosses are rehiring.
Why
are unemployed Singaporeans staying away from service jobs?
In America car engineers have worked as hamburger flippers
– but never here!
The
baffling question is best left for the sociologist, rather
than the economist, to answer. Some blame it on misplaced
expectations.
Singapore
has produced a new highly-educated generation with high
expectation, so jobs perceived as lowly get ignored.
It is
a national problem. The shortage affects every consumer
in Singapore.
Significantly
raising wages may attract local workers, but it will lead
to higher prices for consumers’ pockets.
It is
driving Singapore to become more dependent on foreign workers,
who already make up a third of its work-force and its population.
In the
latest case, hundreds of cooked food-stalls, a major source
of cheap meals, petitioned the government to be allowed
to hire more workers from overseas.
Many
of these low-margin - but socially important - operations
had been forced to close because they couldn’t find
locals to cook, wash and serve customers.
Each
closure deals a blow to the lower-middle class workers and
students who frequent them on a daily basis,” a Chinese
newspaper reporter said.
"The
issue we face now is that there are less and less Singaporeans
willing to join. Fundamentally there is no stable staff
base to train," explained an executive of a food and
beverage chain.
Availability is just one aspect, the other is that the foreigners
work harder, longer hours, while accepting sharply lower
salaries.
Employers would rather have cheaper, harder-working nationals
from China, India, Myanmar, Philippines, etc, working for
them entirely - but for a government permit quota restriction.
Last
month the authorities significantly loosened it for the
service sector, which makes up 65 per cent of the economy.
Employers
can now hire five foreign workers for every five locals
employed - up from a 3-in-7 ratio.
This
change is merely following the reality on the ground. For
many months now, so many foreigners have been seen in public
places that even a one-for-one rule appears irrelevant.
As an
example, of the 136,500 service jobs created last year,
more than half – or 54 per cent went to foreigners.
Served
By Foreigners
Today
Singapore is served by foreign nationals more than they
are by their own people.
If they
pull out, life here comes to a complete standstill.
They
work as waiters, sales-persons, cooks, nurses, bus drivers,
and a wide range of white-collar service jobs.
They
hail from some 20 countries all over the world, led by Malaysia,
China and the Asean region, the latest being Nepal.
The
relaxation may have been timed to come just ahead of the
scheduled launch early next year of the two big casino resorts
– Sands at Marina Bay and Resorts World at Sentosa.
Both
need tens of thousands of workers - more than Singapore
can produce by itself, so the bulk may come from abroad.
Some
say the green-light to allow one foreign worker to match
every Singaporean in the service industry, will have a big
impact on the demography, and even redirect its history.
The
reason is that the accounts for a massive 68 percent of
the Singapore’s total work-force.
The
majority are here on contract and may leave after a few
years, but the unending recycling itself will have a permanent
mark on the city.
The
strategy has turned a full circle from a generation ago.
At the time, large multi-nationals were flocking in to open
up factories to manufacture products for export.
I remember
how shocked I was at being told that my country, to survive,
needed a massive inflow of foreign workers because our citizens
could fill only one of every seven vacancies generated.
The
official mindset towards the issue, too, has changed.
The
political leadership under Mr. Lee Kuan Yew and Mr. Goh
Keng Swee was a lot more wary about having too many foreigners.
The
first concern was not its social impact, but the nation’s
stability and security.
In several
briefings, we were cautioned that having too many foreigners
working in our midst could expose this tiny island to possible
foreign manipulation - or even control.
The
use of foreign workers to organise strikes and street violence
could be become a weapon by a foreign power to blackmail
Singapore.
In one
briefing, editors were also told that Singapore would avoid
Europe’s ‘addiction’ to cheap labour from
Asia and Africa.
Look
at the street violence they imported from home to the streets
of Paris and other cities! I was told.
To prevent
this, Singapore opted to automate operations to stem the
high manpower consumption, and move some factories to Batam
and other places.
But
these days, under the shadow of an economic crisis, such
talk has all, but disappeared. We seem to be moving the
opposite direction.
(A
slightly shorter version was published in The Star on July,
18, 2009)