Singapore's
Foreign workers
They cost the same to a boss as a local worker on real costs,
reports US Barbara Garson. zmag.org.
Jun 17, 2006
"There
are no Americans willing to do those jobs," says the
man who needs his crops picked or his tables bussed."
I've recently visited two countries where that's actually
true.
Singapore
and Switzerland don't have enough citizens to fill all the
jobs. So these two wealthy nations bring in vast numbers
of guest workers from surrounding poor regions.
Neither
the Swiss nor the Singaporeans are particularly foreigner-friendly,
yet the migrants cause very little tension internally and
neither country requires militarised borders to keep hordes
of poor people out.
Singapore
and Switzerland treat their "guests" very differently.
But they both employ strategies to keep foreign workers
from undermining local wages.
This
is the common policy that keeps their borders secure and
it's one we could emulate. But first let me describe the
differences Singapore's guest workers are rigidly segregated.
Construction
workers often live right on the construction site, sleeping
in longhouses or metal containers. The one place I could
hope to meet one was at a run-down Mall where crowds of
migrants gather on their day off.
One
man I approached led me into the alley and spread newspaper
on the pavement so we could sit down to talk.
"There
are benches across the way," I suggested, pointing
to a green space. "Singaporeans don't like to see us
on the street," he answered.
That's
absolutely true. Singapore employers put down a S$5,000
bond for each worker they bring into the country. They're
required to house, feed, and over see the departure of each
individual or they don't get their $5,000 back.
There's
no way that Singapore's migrants can blend into the community,
even though many belong to the same ethnic groups as native
Singaporeans.
In Switzerland migrants live more like normal people. I
visited an Alpine resort town where most of the hotel workers
were Portuguese.
A local
Swiss ski instructor complained that he could no longer
afford to live in his hometown with so many Chalets bought
up by British tourists.
So I
asked one of the Portuguese hotel workers if the management
provided dormitories. She looked confused. "Well how
do you live in such an expensive place?"
"I
have a job," she answered. "I rent an apartment."
Though she will never become a Swiss citizen, she was a
bit insulted by the suggestion that she was different from
other workers.
Migrants
in Singapore are not only more isolated than in Switzerland,
they're also paid less. The Portuguese worker in Switzerland
gets the going wage.
The
Filipino in Singapore takes home about a third of what a
native would get.
But
- and here's that important similarity-in both countries:
A FOREIGN WORKER COSTS HIS EMPLOYER THE SAME AS
A LOCAL.
A few
decades ago Prime Minister Lee Kwan Yew realised that Singapore
could never win the worldwide competition to offer cheap
labour.
He decided
instead, that this one equatorial Island among hundreds,
was to become a high value-added producer.
To Lee
that meant wages had to be high enough to encourage Singapore's
businessmen to invest in labor saving technology. To raise
Singapore salaries he had to make sure that local wages
wouldn't be under-cut by migrants.
So Lee
set a high levy on each migrant's salary. Yes, you could
pay an unskilled Bangladeshi S$400 dollars a month. But
in that case you had to pay the state another S$400 a month.
Coming
from the US I simply couldn't believe that a government,
however indifferent to the welfare of foreigners, was honestly
trying to keep its own people's wages up.
But
I interviewed a labour contractor who brought Indians, Filipinos
and some of the first Mainland Chinese migrants into Singapore.
He told me that he would have to pay a Singaporean welder
$2,500 a month. "And the foreigners?" I asked.
He took
out a pencil to calculate his cost.
"Salary
$900, levy $200 [it was lower on skilled workers], meal
allowance $250, accommodation…insurance…interest
on the bond…" His final figure was "The
same! $2,500 a month."
Singapore's
employers will tolerate this kind of micro-regulation. The
Swiss rely more on faux laisez-faire. For example, during
the international recession of 1973,
Switzerland
didn't extend unemployment insurance to guest workers. With
no way to support themselves in that expensive country,
most went home.
As a
result, the Swiss unemployment rate remained low while it
soared in the rest of Europe and in the US
In similar
circumstance Singapore would simply lower the quota of foreign
workers that each industry is allowed to employ. But the
underlying principle is the same.
Foreign
workers must not be pitted against citizens.
US policy
is exactly the opposite. Recently we've been offered competing
suggestions about how harsh or lenient to be toward Mexicans
who sneak across our borders. The most pernicious plan comes,
as usual, from our president.
His
national-guard proposal heightens our fear of Mexican hordes
while his guest worker plan increases the real reasons we
have to worry. We are right to fear foreigners brought into
the country to work at wages we can't live on.
The
US already permits 800,000 legal "guests" each
year. That's more than the highest estimate of illegals.
By greatly expanding that number the presidents bill guarantees
the creation of even more jobs "Americans don't want."
Unfortunately
all the contending proposals included some provision for
lower paid guests in ways designed to undermine American
wages. Making us poorer is a bi-partisan policy.
[I ran
into the Swiss ski instructor again right before I left
his country. He was still railing against the British week-enders
who drive up prices. But I couldn't lure him into bad mouthing
the Portuguese. After all, they were only there because
there really weren't enough Swiss to serve all the tourists.]
Singapore
and Switzerland need foreign workers.
Maybe
the US does too. How to find out? Offer the jobs at good
US wages. If there really are no Americans to pick crops
or buss tables, by all means invite people from over the
border at the same good pay.
But
to implement this policy with the requisite flexibility,
you have to have a government that's on your side. Barbara
Garson is the Author of "MacBird" and the new
comedy "Security"
http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=10374§ionID=30