Weblogs
Web of Influence
Singaporean bloggers will rise significantly,
vast majority non-political joining worldwide numbers that
may reach 10m in 2005 - a growing source of influence. Foreign
Policy.
Nov 26, 2004
Every
day, millions of online diarists, or "bloggers,"
share their opinions with a global audience. Drawing upon
the content of the international media and the World Wide
Web, they weave together an elaborate network with agenda-setting
power on issues ranging from human rights in China to the
U.S. occupation of Iraq.
What
began as a hobby is evolving into a new medium that is changing
the landscape for journalists and policymakers alike.
It was
March 21, 2003-two days after the United States began its
"shock and awe" campaign against Iraq-and the
story dominating TV networks was the rumor (later proven
false) that Saddam Hussein's infamous cousin, Ali Hassan
al-Majid ("Chemical Ali"), had been killed in
an air strike.
But,
for thousands of other people around the world who switched
on their computers rather than their television sets, the
lead story was the sudden and worrisome disappearance of
Salam Pax.
Otherwise
known as the "Baghdad Blogger," Salam Pax was
the pseudonym for a 29-year-old Iraqi architect whose online
diary, featuring wry and candid observations about life
in wartime, transformed him into a cult figure.
It turned
out that technical difficulties, not US cruise missiles
or Baathist Party thugs, were responsible for the three-day
Salam Pax blackout. In the months that followed, his readership
grew to millions, as his accounts were quoted in the New
York Times, BBC, and Britain's Guardian newspaper.
If the
first Gulf War introduced the world to the "CNN effect,"
then the second Gulf War was blogging's coming out party.
Salam Pax was the most famous blogger during that conflict
(he later signed a book and movie deal), but myriad other
online diarists, including U.S. military personnel, emerged
to offer real-time analysis and commentary.
Blogs
(short for "weblogs") are periodically updated
journals, providing online commentary with minimal or no
external editing.
They
are usually presented as a set of "posts," individual
entries of news or commentary, in reverse chronological
order. The posts often include hyperlinks to other sites,
enabling commentators to draw upon the content of the entire
World Wide Web.
Blogs
can function as personal diaries, political analysis, advice
columns on romance, computers, money, or all of the above.
Numbers
flourish
Their
number has grown at an astronomical rate. In 1999, the total
number of blogs was estimated to be around 50; five years
later, the estimates range from 2.4 million to 4.1 million.
The
Perseus Development Corporation, a consulting firm that
studies Internet trends, estimates that by 2005 more than
10 million blogs will have been created. Media institutions
have adopted the form as well, with many television networks,
newspapers, and opinion journals now hosting blogs on their
Web sites, sometimes featuring dispatches from their own
correspondents, other times hiring full-time online columnists.
Blogs
are already influencing US politics. The top five political
blogs together attract over half a million visitors per
day. Jimmy Orr, the White House Internet director, recently
characterized the "blogosphere" (the all-encompassing
term to describe the universe of weblogs) as instrumental,
important, and underestimated in its influence.
Nobody knows that better than Trent Lott, who in December
2002 resigned as US Senate majority leader in the wake of
inflammatory comments he made at Sen. Strom Thurmond's 100th
birthday party.
Initially,
Lott's remarks received little attention in the mainstream
media. But the incident was the subject of intense online
commentary, prodding renewed media attention that converted
Lott's gaffe into a full-blown scandal.
Political
scandals are one thing, but can the blogosphere influence
global politics as well? Compared to other actors in world
affairs-governments, international organizations, multinational
corporations, and even nongovernmental organisations (NGOs)-blogs
do not appear to be very powerful or visible.
Even
the most popular blog garners only a fraction of the Web
traffic that major media outlets attract.
According
to the 2003 Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
Internet Survey, only 4 percent of online Americans refer
to blogs for information and opinions. The blogosphere has
no central organisation, and its participants have little
ideological consensus.
Indeed,
an October 2003 survey of the blogosphere conducted by Perseus
concluded that "the typical blog is written by a teenage
girl who uses it twice a month to update her friends and
classmates on happenings in her life." Blogging is
almost exclusively a part-time, voluntary activity.
The
median income generated by a weblog is zero dollars. How
then can a collection of decentralised, contrarian, and
nonprofit Web sites possibly influence world politics?
Blogs
are becoming more influential because they affect the content
of international media coverage. Journalism professor Todd
Gitlin once noted that media frame reality through "principles
of selection, emphasis, and presentation composed of little
tacit theories about what exists, what happens, and what
matters."
Increasingly,
journalists and pundits take their cues about "what
matters" in the world from weblogs. For salient topics
in global affairs, the blogosphere functions as a rare combination
of distributed expertise, real-time collective response
to breaking news, and public-opinion barometer. What's more,
a hierarchical structure has taken shape within the primordial
chaos of cyberspace.
A few
elite blogs have emerged as aggregators of information and
analysis, enabling media commentators to extract meaningful
analysis and rely on blogs to help them interpret and predict
political developments.
Under
specific circumstances-when key weblogs focus on a new or
neglected issue-blogs can act as a focal point for the mainstream
media and exert formidable agenda-setting power.
Blogs
have ignited national debates on such topics as racial profiling
at airports and have kept the media focused on scandals
as diverse as the exposure of CIA agent Valerie Plame's
identity to bribery allegations at the United Nations.
Although
the blogosphere remains cluttered with the teenage angst
of high school students, blogs increasingly serve as a conduit
through which ordinary and not-so-ordinary citizens express
their views on international relations and influence a policymaker's
decision making.
The
Ties That Bind
University
of Michigan history Professor Juan Cole had a lot to say
about the war on terror and the war in Iraq. Problem was,
not many people were listening. Despite an impressive résumé
(he's fluent in three Middle Eastern languages), Cole had
little success publishing opinion pieces in the mainstream
media, even after Sept. 11, 2001.
His
writings on the Muslim world might have remained confined
to academic journals had he not begun a weblog called "Informed
Comment" as a hobby in 2002. Cole's language proficiency
allowed him to monitor news reports and editorials throughout
the region.
"This was something I could not have been able to do
in 1990, or even 1995," he told a Detroit newspaper,
referring to the surge of Middle Eastern publications on
the Internet.
"I
could get a level of texture and detail that you could never
get from the Western press."
Fellow bloggers took an interest in his writings, especially
because he expressed a skepticism about the US invasion
and occupation of Iraq that stood apart from the often optimistic
mainstream media coverage following the successful overthrow
of the Baathist regime.
Writing
in the summer of 2003, Cole noted: "The Sunni Arabs
north, east and west of Baghdad from all accounts hate the
US and hate US troops being there. This hatred is the key
recruiting tool for the resistance, and it is not lessened
by US troops storming towns. I wish [the counterinsurgency
operation] well; maybe it will work, militarily. Politically,
I don't think it addresses the real problems, of winning
hearts and minds."
As a
prominent expert on the modern history of Shiite Islam,
Cole became widely read among bloggers-and ultimately journalists-following
the outbreak of Iraqi Shiite unrest in early 2004.
With
his blog attracting 250,000 readers per month, Cole began
appearing on media outlets such as National Public Radio
(NPR) and CNN to provide expert commentary. He also testified
before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. "As
a result of my weblog, the Middle East Journal invited me
to contribute for the Fall 2003 issue," he recalls.
"When
the Senate staff of the Foreign Relations Committee did
a literature search on Moktada al-Sadr and his movement,
mine was the only article that came up. Senate staff and
some of the senators themselves read it and were eager to
have my views on the situation."
Cole's
transformation into a public intellectual embodies many
of the dynamics that have heightened the impact of the blogosphere.
He wanted to publicize his expertise, and he did so by attracting
attention from elite members of the blogosphere. As Cole
made waves within the virtual world, others in the real
world began to take notice.
Most
bloggers desire a wide readership, and conventional wisdom
suggests that the most reliable way to gain Web traffic
is through a link on another weblog. A blog that is linked
to by multiple other sites will accumulate an ever increasing
readership as more bloggers discover the site and create
hyperlinks on their respective Web pages.
Thus,
in the blogosphere, the rich (measured in the number of
links) get richer, while the poor remain poor.
This
dynamic creates a skewed distribution where there are a
very few highly ranked blogs with many incoming links, followed
by a steep falloff and a very long list of medium-to low-ranked
bloggers with few or no incoming links.
One
study by Clay Shirky, an associate professor at New York
University, found that the Internet's top dozen bloggers
(less than 3 percent of the total examined) accounted for
approximately 20 percent of the incoming links. Some link-deprived
blogs may become rich over time as top bloggers link to
them, which helps explain why new bloggers are not discouraged.
Consequently,
even as the blogosphere continues to expand, only a few
blogs are likely to emerge as focal points. These prominent
blogs serve as a mechanism for filtering interesting blog
posts from mundane ones.
When
less renowned bloggers write posts with new information
or a new slant, they will contact one or more of the large
focal point blogs to publicisde their posts.
In this
manner, poor blogs function as fire alarms for rich blogs,
alerting them to new information and links. This self-perpetuating,
symbiotic relationship allows interesting arguments and
information to make their way to the top of the blogosphere.
The
skewed network of the blogosphere makes it less time-consuming
for outside observers to acquire information. The media
only need to look at elite blogs to obtain a summary of
the distribution of opinions on a given political issue.
The
mainstream political media can therefore act as a conduit
between the blogosphere and politically powerful actors.
The comparative advantage of blogs in political discourse,
as compared to traditional media, is their low cost of real-time
publication.
Bloggers
can post their immediate reactions to important political
events before other forms of media can respond. Speed also
helps bloggers overcome their own inaccuracies. When confronted
with a factual error, they can quickly correct or update
their post.
Through
these interactions, the blogosphere distills complex issues
into key themes, providing cues for how the media should
frame and report a foreign-policy question.
Small
surprise, then, that a growing number of media leaders-editors,
publishers, reporters, and columnists-consume political
blogs. New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller said
in a November 2003 interview, "Sometimes I read something
on a blog that makes me feel we screwed up."
Howard Kurtz, one of the most prominent media commentators
in the United States, regularly quotes elite bloggers in
his "Media Notes Extra" feature for the Washington
Post's Web site.
Many
influential foreign affairs columnists, including Paul Krugman
and Fareed Zakaria, have said that blogs form a part of
their information-gathering activities.
For
the mainstream media-which almost by definition suffer a
deficit of specialized, detailed knowledge-blogs can also
serve as repositories of expertise. And for readers worldwide,
blogs can act as the "man on the street," supplying
unfiltered eyewitness accounts about foreign countries.
This
facet is an especially valuable service, given the decline
in the number of foreign correspondents since the 1990s.
Blogs may even provide expert analysis and summaries of
foreign-language texts, such as newspaper articles and government
studies, that reporters and pundits would not otherwise
access or understand.
Even foreign-policy novices leave their mark on the debate.
David Nishimura, an art historian and vintage pen dealer,
emerged as an unlikely commentator on the Iraq war through
his blog, "Cronaca," which he describes as a "compilation
of news concerning art, archaeology, history, and whatever
else catches the chronicler's eye, with the odd bit of opinion
and commentary thrown in."
In the
month after the fall of Hussein's regime in April 2003,
there was much public hand-wringing about reports that more
than 170,000 priceless antiques and treasures had been looted
from the Iraqi National Museum in Baghdad.
In response
to these newspaper accounts, a number of historians and
archaeologists scorned the U.S. Defense Department for failing
to protect the museum.
Nishimura,
however, scrutinised the various media reports and found
several inconsistencies. He noted that the 170,000 number
was flat-out wrong; that the actual losses, though serious,
were much smaller than initial reports suggested; and that
museum officials might have been complicit in the looting.
"Smart
money still seems to be on the involvement of Ba'athists
and/or museum employees," he wrote. "The extent
to which these categories overlap has been danced around
so far, but until everything has been properly sorted out,
it might be wise to remember how other totalitarian states
have coopted cultural institutions, enlisting the past to
remake the future."
Prominent
right-of-center bloggers, such as Glenn Reynolds, Andrew
Sullivan, and Virginia Postrel, cited Nishimura's analysis
to focus attention on the issue and correct the original
narrative.
As the
museum looting controversy reveals, blogs are now a "fifth
estate" that keeps watch over the mainstream media.
The
speed of real-time blogger reactions often compels the media
to correct errors in their own reporting before they mushroom.
For example, in June 2003, the Guardian trumpeted a story
in its online edition that misquoted Deputy US Secretary
of Defence Paul Wolfowitz as saying that the United States
invaded Iraq in order to safeguard its oil supply.
The
quote began to wend its way through other media outlets
worldwide, including Germany's Die Welt. In the ensuing
hours, numerous bloggers led by Greg Djerijian's "Belgravia
Dispatch" linked to the story and highlighted the error,
prompting the Guardian to retract the story and apologise
to its readers before publishing the story in its print
version.
Bloggers
have become so adept at fact-checking the media that they've
spawned many other high-profile retractions and corrections.
The
most noteworthy was CBS News' acknowledgement that it could
not authenticate documents it had used in a story about
President George W. Bush's National Guard service that bloggers
had identified as forgeries.
When
such corrections are made, bloggers create the impression
at times that contemporary journalism has spun out of control.
Glenn Reynolds of "Instapundit" explained to the
Online Journalism Review that he sees parallels between
the impact of the blogosphere and Russia's post-Soviet glasnost.
"People
are appalled, saying it's the decline of journalism.…
But it's the same as when Russia started reporting about
plane crashes and everyone thought they were just suddenly
happening. It was really just the first time people could
read about them."
Media
elites rightly retort that blogs have their own problems.
Their often blatant partisanship discredits them in many
newsrooms.
However,
as Yale University law Professor Jack Balkin says, the blogosphere
has some built-in correction mechanisms for ideological
bias, as "bloggers who write about political subjects
cannot avoid addressing (and, more importantly, linking
to) arguments made by people with different views.
The
reason is that much of the blogosphere is devoted to criticizing
what other people have to say."
The
blogosphere also acts as a barometer for whether a story
would or should receive greater coverage by the mainstream
media. The more blogs that discuss a particular issue, the
more likely that the blogosphere will set the agenda for
future news coverage.
Consider
one recent example with regard to U.S. homeland security.
In July 2004, Annie Jacobsen, a writer for WomensWallStreet.com,
posted online a first-person account of suspicious activity
by Syrian passengers on a domestic US flight:
"After seeing 14 Middle Eastern men board separately
(six together, eight individually) and then act as a group,
watching their unusual glances, observing their bizarre
bathroom activities, watching them congregate in small groups,
knowing that the flight attendants and the pilots were seriously
concerned and now knowing that federal air marshals were
on board, I was officially terrified," she wrote.
Her
account was quickly picked up, linked to, and vigorously
debated throughout the blogosphere. Was this the preparation
for another September 11-style terrorist attack? Was Jacobsen
overreacting, allowing her judgment to be clouded by racial
stereotypes?
Should
the US government end the practice of fining "discriminatory"
airlines that disproportionately search Arab passengers?
In just one weekend, 2 million people read her article.
Reports
soon followed in mainstream media outlets such as NPR, MSNBC,
Time, and the New York Times, prompting a broader national
debate about the racial profiling of possible terrorists.
Some
bloggers purposefully harness the medium to promote wider
awareness of their causes.
With
the assistance of experts including Kenneth Roth, the executive
director of Human Rights Watch, and Samantha Power, the
Pulitzer Prize-winning author of "A Problem from Hell":
America and the Age of Genocide, cyberactivist Joanne Cipolla
Moore set up a blog and Web site, "Passion of the Present,"
devoted to collecting news and information about genocide
in Sudan.
Moore
sought out dozens of elite bloggers to link to her site
and spread the word about Sudan. The blog of Ethan Zuckerman,
a researcher at Harvard Law School's Berkman Centre for
Internet & Society, not only links to Moore's site but
has issued a call to arms to the entire blogosphere: "Blogs
let us tell offline media what we want. When blog readers
made it clear we wanted to know more about Trent Lott's
racist comments, mainstream media picked up the ball and
dug deeper into the story.… What sort of effort would
it take to choose an important issue-say the Sudanese government's
involvement in Darfur-and get enough momentum in the blogosphere
that CNN was forced to bring a camera crew to the region?"
In all
of these instances, bloggers relied on established media
outlets for much of their information.
However,
blogs also functioned as a feedback mechanism for the mainstream
media. In this way, the blogosphere serves both as an amplifier
and as a remixer of media coverage.
For
the traditional media-and ultimately, policymakers-this
makes the blogosphere difficult to ignore as a filter through
which the public considers foreign-policy questions.
Rage
inside the machine
Blogs
are beginning to emerge in countries where there are few
other outlets for political expression. But can blogs affect
politics in regimes where there is no thriving independent
media sector?
Under
certain circumstances, they can. For starters, blogs can
become an alternative source of news and commentary in countries
where traditional media are under the thumb of the state.
Blogs
are more difficult to control than television or newspapers,
especially under regimes that are tolerant of some degree
of free expression.
However,
they are vulnerable to state censorship. A sufficiently
determined government can stop blogs it doesn't like by
restricting access to the Internet, or setting an example
for others by punishing unauthorized political expression,
as is currently the case in Saudi Arabia and China.
The
government may use filtering technologies to limit access
to foreign blogs. And, if there isn't a reliable technological
infrastructure, individuals will be shut out from the blogosphere.
For instance, chronic power shortages and telecommunications
problems make it difficult for Iraqis to write or read blogs.
Faced
with various domestic obstacles, bloggers inside these countries
(or expatriates) can try to influence foreign blogs and
the media through indirect effects at home.
Political
scientists Margaret Keck of Johns Hopkins University and
Kathryn Sikkink of the University of Minnesota note that
activists who are unable to change conditions in their own
countries can leverage their power by taking their case
to transnational networks of advocates, who in turn publicize
abuses and lobby their governments.
Keck
and Sikkink call this a "boomerang effect," because
repression at home can lead to international pressure against
the regime from abroad. Blogs can potentially play a role
in the formation of such transnational networks.
Iran
is a good example. The Iranian blogosphere has exploded.
According to the National Institute for Technology and Liberal
Education's Blog Census, Farsi is the fourth most widely
used language among blogs worldwide. One service provider
alone ("Persian Blog") hosts some 60,000 active
blogs.
The
weblogs allow young secular and religious Iranians to interact,
partially taking the place of reformist newspapers that
have been censored or shut down. Government efforts to impose
filters on the Internet have been sporadic and only partially
successful.
Some
reformist politicians have embraced blogs, including the
president, who celebrated the number of Iranian bloggers
at the World Summit on the Information Society, and Vice
President Muhammad Ali Abtahi, who is a blogger himself.
Elite
Iranian blogs such as "Editor: Myself" have established
links with the English-speaking blogosphere.
When
Sina Motallebi, a prominent Iranian blogger, was imprisoned
for "undermining national security through 'cultural
activity,'" prominent Iranian bloggers were able to
join forces with well-known English-language bloggers including
Jeff Jarvis ("BuzzMachine"), Dan Gillmor ("Silicon
Valley"), and Patrick Belton ("OxBlog") to
create an online coalition that attracted media coverage,
leading to Motallebi's release.
An international
protest campaign also secured the freedom of Chinese blogger
Liu Di, a 23-year-old psychology student who offended authorities
with her satirical comments about the Communist Party.
Yet,
even as Di was released, two individuals who had circulated
online petitions on her behalf were arrested. Such is life
in China, where an estimated 300,000 bloggers (out of 80
million regular Internet users) uneasily coexist with the
government.
Bloggers
in China have perfected the art of self-censorship, because
a single offensive post can affect an entire online community-as
when Internet censors temporarily shut down leading blog
sites such as Blogcn.com in 2003.
Frank
Yu, a Program Manager at Microsoft Research Asia's Advanced
Technology Center in Beijing, described this mind-set as
he profiled a day in the life of a fictional Chinese blogger
he dubbed "John X": "After reading over his
new posting, he checks it for any politically sensitive
terms which may cause the government to block his site….
Although
he is not concerned as much about being shut down, he does
not want all the writers that share the host server with
him to get locked out as well.
Living in China, we learn to pick the battles that we feel
strongly about and let the host of other indignities pass
through quiet compliance." Text messaging is a much
safer medium for the online Chinese community.
Some
bloggers, however, do manage to push the envelope, as when
Shanghai-based Microsoft employee Wang Jianshuo offered
candid, firsthand accounts (including photos) of the SARS
and Avian Flu outbreaks.
North
Korea is perhaps the most blog-unfriendly nation. Only political
elites and foreigners are allowed access to the Internet.
As might be expected, there are no blogs within North Korea,
nor any easy way for ordinary North Koreans to access foreign
blogs.
However,
even in that country, blogs may have an impact. A former
CNN journalist, Rebecca MacKinnon, has set up "NKZone,"
a blog that has rapidly become a focal point for North Korea
news and discussion. As MacKinnon notes, this blog can aggregate
information in a way that ordinary journalism cannot.
North
Korea rarely allows journalists to enter the country, and
when it does, it assigns government minders to watch them
constantly. However, non-journalists can and do enter the
country.
"NKZone"
gathers information from a wide variety of sources, including
tourists, diplomats, NGOs, and academics with direct experience
of life in North Korea, and the blog organises it for easy
consumption. It has already been cited in such prominent
publications as the Asian Wall Street Journal and the Sunday
Times of London as a source for information about North
Korea.
The
growing clout of bloggers has transformed some into "blog
triumphalists." To hear them tell it, blogging is the
single most transformative media technology since the invention
of the printing press.
Rallying
cries, such as "the revolution will be blogged,"
reflect the belief that blogs might even supplant traditional
journalism. But, as the editor of the Washington, D.C.-based
blog "Wonkette," Ana Marie Cox, has wryly observed,
"A revolution requires that people leave their house."
There
remain formidable obstacles to the influence of blogs. All
bloggers, even those at the top of the hierarchy, have limited
resources at their disposal. For the moment, they are largely
dependent upon traditional media for sources of information.
Furthermore,
bloggers have become victims of their own success: As more
mainstream media outlets hire bloggers to provide content,
they become more integrated into politics as usual.
Inevitably,
blogs will lose some of their novelty and immediacy as they
start being co-opted by the very institutions they purport
to critique, as when both major US political parties decided
to credential some bloggers as journalists for their 2004
nominating conventions.
Seoul
blocks some
Bloggers,
even those in free societies, must confront the same issues
of censorship that plague traditional media. South Korea
recently blocked access to many foreign blogs, apparently
because they had linked to footage of Islamic militants
in Iraq beheading a South Korean.
American
stops troops blogging
In the
United States, the Pentagon invoked national security to
shut down blogs written by troops stationed in Iraq. Military
officials claimed that such blogs might inadvertently reveal
sensitive information.
But
Michael O'Hanlon, a defence specialist at the Brookings
Institution, told NPR that he believes "it has much
less to do with operational security and classified secrets,
and more to do with American politics and how the war is
seen by a public that is getting increasingly shaky about
the overall venture."
One
should also bear in mind that the blogosphere, mirroring
global civil society as a whole, remains dominated by the
developed world-a fact only heightened by claims of a digital
divide. And though elite bloggers are ideologically diverse,
they're demographically similar.
Middle-class
white males are overrepresented in the upper echelons of
the blogosphere. Reflecting those demographics, an analysis
conducted by Harvard University's Ethan Zuckerman found
that the blogosphere, like the mainstream media, tends to
ignore large parts of the world.
Nevertheless, as more Web diarists come online, the blogosphere's
influence will more likely grow than collapse. Ultimately,
the greatest advantage of the blogosphere is its accessibility.
A recent
poll commissioned by the public relations firm Edelman revealed
that Americans and Europeans trust the opinions of "average
people" more than most authorities.
Most
bloggers are ordinary citizens, reading and reacting to
those experts, and to the media. As Andrew Sullivan has
observed in the online magazine Slate, "We're writing
for free for anybody just because we love it…. That's
a refreshing spur to write stuff that actually matters,
because you can, and say things you believe in without too
many worries."
This
ariticle by Daniel W Drezner and Henry Farrell was pubished
in Nov-Dec issue of Foreign Policy.
(Drezner
is assistant professor of political science at the University
of Chicago and keeps a daily weblog at www.danieldrezner.com.
Farrell is assistant professor of political science and
international affairs at George Washington University and
a member of the group blog www.crookedtimber.org.)